Page 91 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 91

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 82





                                      Contemporary Cultural Theory



                   universalist rationalism’ (p. 409). It is difficult to avoid the con-
                   clusion that for Habermas the disciplinary habits of sociology
                   tend to pose a recurrent threat to the claims of particularity.
                   Whether or not Honneth’s interests in recognition will provide
                   an adequate solution to this problem remains to be seen. The
                   characteristically abstract quality of German critical theory serves
                   to remind us, however, that cultural studies emerged from a
                   distinctively British intellectual environment barely touched by
                   sociology. This might not be quite the burden it has sometimes
                   seemed.



                   ZIZEK: CRITICAL THEORY GOES LACANIAN

                   Insofar as critical theory can be defined in terms of its com-
                   bination of post-Marxist social critique and post-Freudian
                   psychoanalysis, then Slavoj Zizek, Senior Researcher at the Insti-
                   tute of Social Studies in Ljubljana, Slovenia, has at least as much
                   claim to the title as Habermas or Honneth. Zizek’s work has
                   combined a version of Marxism derived in the first instance from
                   the philosopher Louis Althusser with a version of psychoanaly-
                   sis strongly influenced by Jacques Lacan. Both Althusser and
                   Lacan were loosely (post-) structuralist thinkers (we will consider
                   their work in greater detail in the next chapter). But if Zizek’s
                   theoretical sources were indeed (post-) structuralist, his object has
                   remained social critique of a peculiarly controversial kind. Zizek
                   is an immensely prolific writer, whose work has ranged across a
                   wide variety of cultural phenomena, moving with apparent ease
                   between philosophy and politics, literature and film, in an often
                   startling blend of Hegel and Hitchcock, Lacan and Lukács (Zizek,
                   1992; Zizek, 2001). Quite apart from its applications to clinical
                   practice, Zizek has brought Lacanian psychoanalysis to bear quite
                   centrally on philosophy and politics, especially as these are under-
                   stood from the perspective of ideology critique.
                      In two early works, The Sublime Object of Ideology and Looking
                   Awry, Zizek had established, by turn, a Lacanian reconstruction
                   of the theory of ideology from Marx to Althusser (Zizek, 1989)
                   and a critical account of the politics of Lacan’s return to Freud

                                               82
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96