Page 159 - Contemporary Political Sociology Globalization Politics and Power
P. 159

Citizenship 145


                    who are poor over the long - term, it is argued, reproduce a  “ culture of
                    poverty, ”  using welfare to avoid working in paid employment and lacking
                    motivation to integrate with the rest of society. The underclass is seen as
                    made up of single mothers dependent on welfare and semi - criminal men
                    who do not work, and is associated with a supposedly black lifestyle in
                    which women have children by many fathers who do not provide for
                    them. The large numbers of black people living in poverty in the ghettos
                    of American cities are seen to make up an  “ underclass. ”  In actual fact,
                    most of the poor in the US do not live in urban areas and most are not
                    black (Fainstein,  1996 ). Nevertheless, theorists of the  “ underclass ”  see it
                    as reproducing poverty. In the US, young, unmarried, or childless men

                    have no automatic right to state benefits; they have the right to insurance -
                      based unemployment benefit, but growing numbers do not qualify for it

                    because they have worked too little and made too few contributions. It
                    is practically only single mothers who are eligible for the means - tested

                    welfare benefit, Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Charles Murray,
                    one of the most important proponents of the New Right view of the
                      “ underclass, ”  argues from a rational choice perspective that welfare
                    benefits make dependence on the state a more attractive possibility for

                    many women than marriage or paid employment (Lister,  1996 ). The solu-
                    tion is to alter the rational choices of poor mothers by making them work
                    for welfare.
                         In the 1980s, William Julius Wilson tried to produce a different under-
                    standing of the  “ underclass, ”  arguing that it should be seen as an eco-
                    nomic and social phenomenon rather than the result of rational individual
                    choices. He argued that the  “ underclass ”  is synonymous with  “ the ghetto, ”
                    the result of the black middle - classes moving out of the inner cities and
                    the worsening economic prospects for the deprived African - Americans
                    who remain there. In Wilson ’ s view, the most important problem for
                    members of the  “ underclass ”  is social isolation; many families in poor
                    areas of the city experience long - term unemployment, and, because they
                    have few contacts with those in steady jobs, welfare dependence becomes
                    a way of life (Wilson,  1987 ). However, despite Wilson ’ s stress on struc-
                    tural causes, his use of the term  “ underclass ”  is seen as too close to the
                    moral terminology of the New Right to challenge their interpretation of
                    urban poverty. As a result, he has abandoned the term, preferring  “ ghetto
                    poor ”  (Silver,  1996 ).
                         In Europe, the term  “  socially excluded ”  is more commonly used to
                    distinguish the poor from the rest of society.  “ Social exclusion ”  came to
                    prominence in France in the mid - 1980s to refer to growing unemploy-
                    ment, marginalization, and perceptions of a general increase in the
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164