Page 53 - Contemporary Political Sociology Globalization Politics and Power
P. 53

Changing Definitions of Politics and Power 39

                      “ methodological nationalism, ”  the construction of societies as internal to
                    state borders, is no longer viable (Beck,  2000 ). Indeed, as a way of under-
                    standing empires, and the subsequent inter - connections of metropolitan
                    centers and post - colonial states, it was always limited (see Bhambra,
                      2007 ). Social life must be rethought in terms of multiple and multiscalar
                    networks and identities, and power and politics as an aspect of social life
                    rather than as separate institutions within a society governed by a single
                    determining base, as in the case of Marxism, a single inexorable logic,
                    as in Weber ’ s rationalization thesis, or functionalist social solidarity, as
                    for Durkheim. Globalization opens up issues that require a wider view of
                    power and politics than that provided by the framework of classical politi-
                    cal sociology.
                         In chapter  3 , we look at social movements, which displace the focus of
                    classical political sociology on social systems and questions of causality,
                    shifting attention to the way in which social actors make society through
                    cultural politics. Social movements transform social relations by challeng-

                    ing and redefining meanings and creating new collective identities across

                    the social field. The study of social movements also shifts the focus on
                    relations between state and society. Social movements are at least as con-
                    cerned with personal decisions and with changing the rules and routines
                    of everyday life as they are with policies and the law. The state is often
                    seen as biased and bureaucratic, too blunt an instrument to bring about
                    the detailed transformation in social relations at which they aim.
                    Nevertheless, contrary to the claims of some theorists of social move-
                    ments, the activities of social movements are not confi ned exclusively to
                    changing ways of life through micro - politics. Indeed, even the global
                    social movements that have become prominent over the last decade are

                    often engaged in redefining state policies and practices, both from below,
                    within national territories, and from above, through the international
                    organizations of global governance.
                         In chapter  4 , we examine how the cultural politics in which social
                    movements engage are transforming citizenship. Citizenship rights are as
                    much a matter of definition as the contestation of identity, lifestyle, media

                    representations, and ethical consumerism with which social movements
                    are more typically linked. Citizenship involves questions of identity and
                    membership that have been central to social movements concerned with
                      “ difference. ”  Feminism, the gay and lesbian movement, and anti - racist
                    movements are sometimes thought of in derogatory terms as involving
                      “ identity politics. ”  Challenging the way particular groups have been
                    identified as inferior, trying to change what is generally seen as a source

                    of shame into pride, they have been criticized for giving too much
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58