Page 357 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 357

Tunable stiffness using negative Poisson's ratio  323


                       Conventional                       Auxetic
                      (Positive Poisson's ratio)         (Negative  Poisson's ratio)
                         Pull                              Pull





              Pull                              Pull
              Fig. 3 Comparison of a positive Poisson’s ratio material (left) vs a negative Poisson’s
              ratio material (right).

                 These types of materials display interesting properties, such as light
              weight, indentation resistance, impact resistance, shear resistance, and better
              energy absorption capabilities as compared to conventional materials. While
              there has been previous work done in the field of purely auxetic materials,
              they have focused more on theoretical modeling than exploring the practical
              applications of such materials in the field of variable stiffness devices. In this
              study, we develop a stiffness tuning framework using continuum tubular
              auxetic materials.
                 For a proof-of-concept, we restricted ourselves to fabricating these
              materials using commonly available and cheap processes, thereby improv-
              ing the speed and economic feasibility of manufacture. We employed
              structures that could be fabricated by simple 3D printing as well as kiri-
              gami and origami folding structures as simple, fast, and low-cost methods
              of fabrication to prove the concepts with the following design require-
              ments in mind:
              •  Geometric constraint: 10–12mm maximum outer diameter
              •  Compatible with the tendon driven actuation method
              •  Shift from flexible to stiff and vice versa without using temperature
                 regulations



              4 Concentric continuum metastructures

              Our primary hypothesis for a conceptualized mechanism is to vary the stiff-
              ness of our tubular surgical device by using the concept of jamming. How-
              ever, unlike layer or space jamming, we use the inherent mechanism of
              auxetic materials, which expands upon elongation. This is more advanta-
              geous as compared to using a vacuum as there is no need for sealing, which
              is often one of the biggest challenges associated with jamming. By restricting
              the space available for the expansion of the auxetic material, it is possible to
   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362