Page 511 - Corrosion Engineering Principles and Practice
P. 511

478    C h a p t e r   1 2                                                                                                        C o r r o s i o n   a s   a   R i s k    479


                      Such changes require more corrosion vigilance in terms of inspection
                      and monitoring.

                 12.2  Risk Analysis

                      Risk analysis refers to techniques for identifying, characterizing, and
                      evaluating hazards. The identification of risk, defined in Eq. (12.1),
                      and risk analysis found their way into many applications where they
                      can  add  value  in  prioritization  and  management  processes.  The
                      application of general risk analysis principles to help prioritize and
                      manage the inspection program for plant equipment, now commonly
                      referred  to  as  risk-based  inspection  (RBI),  is  one  of  the  newest
                      applications of risk principles [3]. Some examples of risk criteria and
                      associated units are shown in Table 12.1.

                                                       q
                        Risk = Probability of Failure (POF) ×  Consequence of Failure (COF) (12.1)

                         In this equation the POF is either based on failure frequency or on
                      remaining  lifetime,  while  COF  is  usually  related  to  safety,  health,
                      environment, and economics issues.
                         Data required for developing a risk assessment program are often
                      acquired  during  the  analysis  of  failed  components  and  systems.
                      However, conducting a failure analysis is not an easy or straightfor-
                      ward task. Early recognition of corrosion as a factor in a failure is
                      critical, since much important corrosion information can be lost if a
                      failure scene is altered or changed before appropriate observations
                      and tests can be made.
                         To avoid these pitfalls, certain systematic procedures have been
                      proposed to guide an investigator through the failure analysis process.
                      Materials Technology Institute (MTI), for example, has produced an
                      Atlas of Corrosion and Related Failures that maps out the process of a
                      failure investigation from the request for the analysis to the submission
                      of a report [4]. The section that relates the origin(s) of failure to plant or
                      component geometry in this atlas is illustrated in Figs. 12.1 and 12.2.


                  Risk criteria                     Expressed in
                  Financial risk (business impact)  Outage cost / day
                  Investment risk (asset damage)    Equipment cost / m 2
                  Safety                            Injury cost / year
                  Environment                       Cost / year
                  Potential of loss of life (PLL)   Events / year
                  Probability/likelihood of failure  Events / year

                 TABLE 12.1  Examples of Risk Criteria and Their Units
   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516