Page 10 - Courting the Media Contemporary Perspectives on Media and Law
P. 10

In: Courting the Media: Contemporary …      ISBN: 978-1-61668-784-7
                             Editors: Geoffrey Sykes            © 2010 Nova Science Publishers, Inc.






                             Chapter 1



                                       INTRODUCTION – “MEDIATING
                                                    MEDIATION”



                                 The theme of this anthology could broadly be tagged or summarised by
                             two terms: media and law. However speculative it might seem to combine two
                             terms,  each  of  which  is  already  conceptually  broad,  even  vague  in  its  own
                             right,  for  the  past  decades  there  has  been  a  general  understanding  about
                             particular issues that are relevant to any relationship of law and media. Two
                             main  perspectives  initially  spring  to  mind:  the  access  of  mass  media,  in
                             particular television, to court and legal processes, and the representation and
                             depiction  of  court  and  legal  processes  by  the  mass  media,  in  particular
                             television.  The  relationship  between  the  two  terms  can  be  seen  quickly  as
                             reflecting  a  public  relationship  between  two  powerful  and  significant
                             institutions  in  the  public  sphere  –  that  of  broadcast  television,  and  legal
                             practice.
                                 These two sectors can be regarded as fundamentally distinct yet also inter-
                             related. The problematic issue of allowing television cameras and journalists
                             direct access to court proceedings, for example, remains largely unresolved in
                             many  jurisdictions,  yet  longstanding  restrictions  or  outright  prohibition  by
                             news or current affairs programs has not stopped a plethora of court, detection,
                             current  affairs,  forensic  and  drama  programs  from  capitalising  on  public
                             interest in the same subject matter that is not available in real time broadcasts.
                             It is possible to argue that issues of confidentiality, probity and regulation of
                             crime  and  legal  processes  (the  media  term  is  gate-keeping  or  exclusion  of
                             subjects from media attention) has in part motivated the fictional depictions of
                             the  same  processes.  Such  negative  motivation  –  to  depict  indirectly  what
                             cannot be  positively permitted or seen - of course only in part explains the
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15