Page 27 - Courting the Media Contemporary Perspectives on Media and Law
P. 27

18                 Shaeda Isani and Geoffrey Sykes


                             source  of  puzzlement  to  the  French  who  have  no  equivalent  jurisdiction.  A
                             Channel  4  English  observation  documentary  entitled  ―The  Coroner‖,  first
                             broadcast  in  March  1999,  was  used  as  a  visual  support  to  illustrate  what  a
                             coroner‘s functions in England are. The documentary was, on the whole, very
                             restrained, although parts of it were highly suggestive as, for example, the to-
                             and-fro  movements  of the pathologist‘s arms  sawing through  an unseen but
                             nevertheless present cadaver, the zipping up of being zipped, etc. During these
                             passages, some students shut their eyes, protested, and generally moaned about
                             the  ―gruesomeness‖  of  such  scenes.  However,  the  same  students  report that
                             they  regularly  view  American  forensics  television  series  currently  very
                             popular in France, some examples of which are CSI, (which marked the great
                             popularity of forensic television shows), Bones and NCIS, which they found
                             highly entertaining.
                                 In  contrast  to  the  muted  and  restrained  footage  regarding  the  medical
                             examiner‘s work in the BBC documentary, the television series tended to be
                             very explicit about blood, human tissue and dead bodies without any attempt
                             at  visual  ―euphemism‖  destined  to  ―soften‖  the  image  with  regard  to  the
                             viewer‘s sensibilities: the cadaver, its injuries and mutilations, are reduced to
                             an object of scientific reification.
                                 The  contrasted  viewer  reaction  as  expressed  by  the  students  seems
                             paradoxical  and  contradictory  and  motivated  further  enquiry:  why  is  it  that
                             blood and cadavers attract when made explicit in the context of entertainment
                             fiction,  yet  repel  when  merely  suggested  in  the  context  of  an  educational
                             documentary about professional legal work?


                                                    Explaining Effects

                                 The  leading  question  and  point  of  departure  for  this  paper,  is  how  to
                             explain contrasting reactions to the two sources of related material? Why were
                             intelligent, undergraduate, law students, accustomed to discussing the murder
                             and mayhem of criminal law, repulsed by images of footage which, although
                             firsthand, had been carefully edited to cater to sensitivities. The parts that most
                             shocked the students were most implicit: the medical examiner‘s arm shown
                             sawing,  presumably  at  bones,  is  highly  implicit  in  comparison  to  what  is
                             dramatised  on  forensic  drama  where  the  cadaver  is  laid  out  on  ―the
                             pathologist‘s slab‖ and internal organs are shown being weighed and placed in
                             kidney dishes. This reaction raises the question as to why implicit images shot
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32