Page 95 - Courting the Media Contemporary Perspectives on Media and Law
P. 95

86                          David Rolph


                             of  the  Human  Rights  Act  1998  (UK),  which  introduced  the  European
                                                                                         41
                             Convention  on  Human  Rights  into  domestic  law  in  that  jurisdiction.   Like
                                                                                 42
                             other  human  rights  instruments  which  also  protect  privacy,   the  European
                             Convention  on  Human  Rights  is  premised  upon  the  innate  dignity  of  the
                             individual.  In  the  context  of  privacy,  this  has  had  the  profound  impact  of
                             shifting the locus of privacy from the property possessed by an individual to
                             the individual himself or herself.
                                 However, the Human Rights Act 1998 (UK) did not directly introduce an
                             enforceable  right  to  privacy.  Rather,  under  the  European  Convention  on
                             Human Rights there is a right to ‗private life‘, protected under Art. 8, as well
                             as the right to freedom of expression, protected under Art. 10, and courts in the
                             United Kingdom need to ensure that these rights are adequately protected by
                             domestic law and are appropriately balanced against each other. The way in
                             which  courts  in  the  United  Kingdom  responded  was  to  adapt  the  existing
                                                                       43
                             equitable cause of action for breach of confidence.
                                 Prior  to  the  introduction  of  the  Human  Rights  Act  1998  (UK),  the
                             equitable cause of action for breach of confidence had been used for several
                             decades to provide protection against the disclosure of personal secrets. This
                                                                                      44
                             dates back to the decision of Ungoed-Thomas J in Argyll v Argyll,  in which
                             his  Lordship  restrained  the  Duke  of  Argyll  from  disclosing  to  the  tabloid
                             newspaper Sunday People information about the Duchess of Argyll‘s sexual
                                    45
                             exploits.   The  Duke‘s  interview  was  given  in  the  course  of  acrimonious
                                              46
                             divorce proceedings  and in retaliation to an earlier interview given by the
                             Duchess  to  the  Sunday  Mirror,  concerning  the  Duke‘s  health  and  financial
                                   47
                             affairs.  During the mid-1990s, prefiguring subsequent developments in legal
                             thinking, breach of confidence was extended to protect against the disclosure




                             41
                               McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 at 80 per Buxton LJ; Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd
                                 [2008] EMLR 20 at 686 per Eady J.
                             42
                               International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Art. 17; Universal Declaration of Human
                                 Rights Art. 12.
                             43
                               A v B plc [2003] QB 195 at 202 per Lord Woolf CJ; Campbell v M.G.N. Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457
                                 at 465 per Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead; H.R.H. Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers
                                 Ltd [2008] Ch 57 at 114 per curiam; Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR
                                 20 at 686 per Eady J.
                             44
                               [1967] Ch 302.
                             45
                               Argyll v Argyll [1967] Ch 302 at 315 per Ungoed-Thomas J.
                             46
                               Argyll v Argyll [1967] Ch 302 at 316-17 per Ungoed-Thomas J.
                             47
                               Argyll v Argyll [1967] Ch 302 at 330 per Ungoed-Thomas J.
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100