Page 255 - Creating Spiritual and Psychological Resilience
P. 255

224            Creating Spiritual and Psychological Resilence

            recognize signs of disordered responses to disaster. At the third stage, the
            clergy could be instructed to call on the clinician’s expertise to determine
            whether the congregant has clinical needs. Now the parishioner may need
            to receive professional Clinical Care to reduce disorder and to regain func-
            tion. The COPE model is designed to provide burden reduction to clergy at
            this stage by facilitating referrals to clinicians.
              In the fourth stage, patients’ symptoms subside and function increases,
            but they may remain at risk for relapse. As clinical care is reduced, the
            normative social support offered by their religious congregations can help
            to sustain the individuals’ mental health. This fourth stage is an oppor-
            tunity for a return to the first stage through role restoration. Restoration,
            facilitated by Community Care provides burden reduction for clinicians,
            as they plan for a patient’s transition out of acute clinical care and toward
            relapse prevention.



            Synthesis

            When we systematize our field such that we assess and respond only to the
            deficits brought on after a disaster, we miss the rest of life as lived by peo-
            ple. Imagine if botanists organized their work as the study of how to keep
            leaves from turning yellow. As we know, botanists first study the natural
            course of how plants grow green and then investigate those variables that
            help plants thrive in the face of environmental challenges. So too, before a
            disaster, we must catalog our communities’ natural contexts of social sup-
            port. The goal of a community is to thrive. The goal of emergency respond-
            ers is to leave. Therefore, it is the responsibility of responders to develop
            collaboration plans before a disaster, so that community leaders, such as
            the clergy, are recognized for the leaders of continuity and generativity
            that they are. Therefore: Think Continuity, Prepare for Continuity, Build
            Continuity, Enact Continuity.



            Conclusion

            How  do  we  enact  continuity?  First,  we  recognize  the  continuum  of
            mind, body, and spirit within community that was embraced at St. Paul’s
            Chapel in the days after September 11, 2001. The chapters of this book
            note the structural and cultural challenges to providing a complemen-
            tary  continuum  of  care.  These  chapters  also  provide  examples  of  how
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260