Page 56 - Critical Political Economy of the Media
P. 56

What (is) political economy of the media?  35

             a generalist manner at the expense of the values of critical interrogation
             espoused. In both cases the framing of unsophisticated vs. sophisticated serves as
             code to warn students to follow favoured paths and in my view does not always
             encourage efforts to illuminate critical problems, which is the objective of CPE.


             International origins and development
             CPE developed in other regions both through the analysis of national media
             systems and as part of a wider critique of imperialism and dependency, including
             its cultural dimensions. Critical scholars in Latin America, one of the chief targets
             for US-led development projects, challenged the then dominant modernisation
             paradigm which supported models of development that favoured Western economic
             and political interests. Various writers shaped what became known as depen-
             dency theory (Amin 1976; Cardoso and Faletto 1979; Mosco 2009: 101). This
             proposed that transnational businesses, supported by their respective states in
             ‘core’ countries, exercised power over ‘peripheral’ countries and regions through
             their control of productive resources and labour. Dependency theorists were
             amongst the first to examine international cultural flows and the ways in which
             modernisation programmes in developing countries favoured the interests and
             expansion of Western media companies. A body of critical communications
             scholarship developed in the 1960s that influenced and anticipated work on
             media globalisation in subsequent decades. This work drew on an intellectual
             and research agenda shaped by anti-colonial movements and struggle for self-
             determination by radical intellectuals such as Frantz Fanon in Algeria and Paulo
             Freire in Brazil, who had emphasised the importance of mass communication for
             liberation movements.


             Summary of CPE development
             There are diverse traditions, strands and clusters (institutional and geocultural)
             that developed and continue to proliferate. The influence of political economy
             within the field of communications scholarship varies across time, subject area
             and region. However, a general contour can be outlined. CPE themes were
             framed against the backdrop of a resurgent Western Marxism, the rise of dissident
             social movements and anti-imperialist sentiments worldwide in the 1960s and
             1970s. CPE emerged as an articulated set of claims and research priorities in the
             1970s. This was a period of intellectual ascendency for neo-Marxist influence
             within the humanities and social sciences where media, communications and
             cultural studies were located. Critical political economy was never a uniform
             approach. Some strands have focused on ideology and subjectivity, others on the
             economy, capitalist production and class relations, labour and class struggle (see
             Schiller 1996: 132–84; Mosco 2009; Pietilä 2005: 221–44). The CPE approach
             that developed from the 1970s had at its core the recognition of media as
             industries which produce and distribute commodities (Murdock and Golding
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61