Page 121 - Critical Theories of Mass Media
P. 121

JOBNAME: McGraw−TaylorHarris PAGE: 22 SESS: 10 OUTPUT: Mon Oct 8 09:05:28 2007 SUM: 415E2B1C
   /production/mcgraw−hill/booksxml/tayharris/chap04












                             106   Then
                                This places McLuhan in a curious relation to the other theorists
                             we have examined, most of whom adopt a uniformly critical position
                             in relation to the mass media. Raymond Williams powerfully articu-
                             lates the case against McLuhan in this respect when he says:
                                If specific media are essentially psychic adjustments, coming not
                                from our relation with ourselves but between a generalized
                                human organism and its general physical environment, then of
                                course intention … is irrelevant … and with intention goes
                                content … All media are in effect desocialised: they are simple
                                physical events in an abstracted sensorium … If the effect of the
                                medium is the same, whoever controls or uses it, and whatever
                                apparent content he may try to insert, then we can forget
                                ordinary cultural and political argument and let the technology
                                run itself.
                                                                        (Williams 1974: 127)
                             If on one level McLuhan’s fidelity to the medium as message
                             resulted in a failure to consider the very real social, economic and
                             political conditions in which it was installed, it also provided him
                             with fundamental insights into unique experiential and cultural
                             opportunities generated, and enabled him to anticipate, amid a
                             welter of pseudo-prophecy, a number of very real trends. Thus
                             Williams’s further judgement that the influence of McLuhan’s media
                             theory ‘is unlikely to last long’ appears today, given the rise in
                             McLuhan’s stock in the digital era, as misguided as McLuhan’s most
                             foolish pronouncements.
                                Williams’s criticism prefigures some of the analysis of the pro-
                             found cultural harm caused by the media, encountered in Part 2.
                             Whereas Williams and more contemporary theorists (like Benjamin
                             before them) frequently see room for the development of positive
                             social forces within such powerful media trends, critical theorists
                             tend to take Williams’s fears as an accurate summary of social and
                             political conditions within the mediascape. As an introduction to
                             Part 2’s latest versions of these critical accounts, in the next chapter
                             we see how, in the 1960s, Guy Debord combined a McLuhanite
                             account of specific media properties with a much more politically
                             informed sense of the wider environmental effects to produce his
                             critical concept of the society of the spectacle.



















                                  Kerrypress Ltd – Typeset in XML A Division: chap04 F Sequential 22


                    www.kerrypress.co.uk - 01582 451331 - www.xpp-web-services.co.uk
                    McGraw Hill - 152mm x 229mm - Fonts: New Baskerville
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126