Page 186 - Critical Theories of Mass Media
P. 186

JOBNAME: McGraw−TaylorHarris PAGE: 17 SESS: 9 OUTPUT: Mon Oct 8 09:09:07 2007 SUM: 593B423D
   /production/mcgraw−hill/booksxml/tayharris/chap07












                                                Banality TV: the democratization of celebrity  171
                           entertain her, take her out to dinner. He walked in with the pizza.
                           She was waiting and eager and hot for him’ (Nitke, cited in
                           Kaufman 2005: 57). Nitke’s account illustrates how social porn’s
                           images are hyper-realistic in terms of visual detail but deeply
                           unrealistic in the sense that they are completely lacking in any more
                           meaningful social context (the full political consequences of which
                           are addressed in the next chapter). It is this simultaneous explicit-
                           ness of depiction but lack of any symbolic content grounded in an
                           authentically specific social context that makes social porn the most
                           recent manifestation of the culture industry’s constant attempts to
                           profit by abstracting from the particular to the general.
                             In ‘Debbie does salad’, Kaufman (2005) describes the close fit
                           between the filming techniques used in pornography and television
                           cooking, pointing out how the filming of Giada, a female cook in a
                           tight-fitting top, highlights the natural affinity between the two
                           genres: ‘this kind of caressing camera going over the food, back and
                           forth and up and down. One of the things that makes it extremely
                           porny is the repetition. You’ll see the peach, and the camera going
                           over those peaches again, then Giada, then the peach, then Giada,
                           then the peach. And so this is very similar to how porn works’
                                                              9
                           (Kaufman, in Gladstone 2005: n.p.). Together in the Food Network
                           studio, Kaufman relates how he and Nitke, watched Tyler Florence,
                           ‘a handsome, sensitive hunk’ interact with a female gastroporn
                           partner:
                             a desperate housewife stared at sturdy young Tyler. Could his
                             arroz con pollo quench her flaming desire? The camera zeroed in
                             as Tyler expertly spread raw chicken breast across a cutting
                             board. ‘That is the quintessential pussy shot,’ Nitke said. ‘The
                             color of it, the texture of it, the camera lingering lovingly over
                             it.’ Tyler gingerly rolled the glistening lips of chicken breast
                             into a thick phallus, which he doused with raw egg. ‘I feel a lot
                             of love right now,’ Tyler told his transfixed acolyte. ‘This is a
                             sexy dish.’ … ‘This is the pizza man,’ declared Nitke. ‘There’s
                             the helpless woman who can’t do it for herself. In walks the
                             cute young guy who rescues her.’
                                                    (Kaufman 2005: 57; original emphasis)
                           Here, Nitke is vividly describing the collapsing of distance in
                           Baudrillard’s obscene and of which Part 1’s key thinkers could only
                           trace the early stages. In Levi-Strauss’s anthropological terms of the
                           raw and the uncooked, gastroporn perfectly represents Banality TV’s
                           reversal of the ‘cooked’ into the ‘raw’ achieved through the removal
                           of the barriers (Baudrillard’s scene/stage) that create symbolic cul-
                           tural meaning through seductive interactions. By providing such close
                           visual detail, the camera: ‘returns us to the innocence of the beasts.
                           Here, we may watch fornication with no sense of the profane, may








                                  Kerrypress Ltd – Typeset in XML A Division: chap07 F Sequential 17


                    www.kerrypress.co.uk - 01582 451331 - www.xpp-web-services.co.uk
                    McGraw Hill - 152mm x 229mm - Fonts: New Baskerville
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191