Page 46 - Critical Theories of Mass Media
P. 46

JOBNAME: McGraw−TaylorHarris PAGE: 17 SESS: 13 OUTPUT: Thu Sep 13 15:44:55 2007 SUM: 51290D2D
   /production/mcgraw−hill/booksxml/tayharris/chap01












                                                       Walter Benjamin’s ‘Work of art’ essay  31
                           the tiny spark of contingency, of the Here and Now, with which
                           reality has so to speak seared the subject’ (Benjamin 1985a: 243).
                           Likewise, in Kracauer the genius particular to photography is to be
                           found in the ‘tiny spark of accident’ that captures a ‘moment of
                           futurity responding to the retrospective gaze’ (Kracauer, cited in
                           Hansen 1987: 209). Barthes ([1957] 1973) describes this quality of
                           photography using the terms punctum and studium. The studium
                           designates the general environment portrayed in a photograph – a
                           family scene, the military associations immediately understood from
                           the picture of a soldier and so on. The punctum is the contingent,
                           inessential detail whose particularity overspills the bounds of the
                           studium’s more general message – the fact the soldier may have a
                           large ear lobe and so on. Benjamin viewed this interruption of the
                           traditional processing of meaning through cultural associations and
                           contemplation as a liberating political development. According to
                           the culture industry thesis, it has proved to be the exact opposite. As
                           Jameson points out above, the rise of the punctum in the age of
                           mechanical reproduction creates an instant reflex that undermines
                           sustained thought. The state of distraction that underwrote Ben-
                           jamin’s revolutionary faith in the new media of his time appears
                           deeply naive in the face of a current mediascape that prides itself
                           upon the generation and clever manipulation of such instant
                           reflexes.
                             Koch suggests that Benjamin’s assertion that film offers the
                           audience the chance to become active in relation to what they are
                           witnessing: ‘is dubious because it excludes the possibility that the
                           apparatus itself might be perceived to be a naturalized fetish with
                           which the audience identifies – less on the level of an instrument
                           with which to test the actor than on the narcissistic level of an
                           enormous extension of the perceptual apparatus’ (Koch 2000:
                           207–8). In other words, the ability of media technologies to act as an
                           extension of our senses (as explored by McLuhan in Chapter 4)
                           becomes an end in itself – it creates a culture of greedy eyes.Itisin
                           such a scenario that the actual content of programmes diminishes in
                           importance and not only are images mechanically reproduced, but
                           so too is their subject matter:


                             Take the truly awful Dallas-Dynasty family of programmes …
                             They are etherealized characters whose simple binary opposi-
                             tions – family/non-family, men/women, sex-power/money-
                             power – may be the vehicles for any fantastic perambulation.
                             And their circle is closed: each opposition complements the
                             other and resists the other. There is no synthesis, and therefore
                             no exit (and therefore as we’ve found no end to the series).
                                                                        (Inglis 1990: 152)








                                  Kerrypress Ltd – Typeset in XML A Division: chap01 F Sequential 17


                    www.kerrypress.co.uk - 01582 451331 - www.xpp-web-services.co.uk
                    McGraw Hill - 152mm x 229mm - Fonts: New Baskerville
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51