Page 34 - Critical and Cultural Theory
P. 34

THE SIGN
     turning it into  an  autonomous  discipline concerned  with  describing
     the  state  of a  linguistic  system  at  any  given  point  in  time  (synchro-
     nic  approach)  and  by  drawing  a  distinction  between  langue,  the
     system  of  language  as  a  whole,  and  parole,  a  specific  utterance.
     Above  all,  Saussure's  theories  are  centred  on  the  concept  of  the
     sign.
       Saussure's  sign  consists  of  two  elements:  the  signifier,  or  sound-
     image,  and  the  signified,  or  the  concept  referred  to.  For  example,
     the  sounds  I  utter  when  I say 'leopard'  and  the  letters  1-e-o-p-a-r-d
     I  put  down  on  paper  when  I  write  the  word  'leopard'  constitute
     the  signifier.  The  concept  of  a  four-legged,  fierce  and  furry  feline
     conveyed  by  those  sounds  or  letters  constitutes  the  signified.  It  is
     the  relationship  between  the  signifier  and  the  signified  that  invests
     a  sign  with  meaning:  neither  signifies  anything  on  its  own.
     Saussure  emphasizes  that  there  is  no  natural  connection  between
     the  signifier  and  the  signified.  The  link  is  always  arbitrary  and
     conventional.  Language  does  not  reflect  a  pre-existing reality;  nor
     does  it  name  universal  concepts  shared  by  all  cultures.  In  fact,  it
     creates  reality  by  chopping  up  the  continuum  of  space  and  time
     into  categories  that  vary  hugely  from  one  culture  to  another
     insofar  as  they  are  produced  in  relation  to  widely  diverse  environ-
     ments.  (It  is  well  known,  for  instance,  that  Eskimos  have  several
     words  for  'snow'  whereas  many  other  cultures  deem  one  word
     sufficient  to  describe  this  particular  entity.)  Saussure  also  stresses
     that  what  makes  a  sign  meaningful  is  not  some  intrinsic  quality.
     Meaning  is the  product  of  a  sign's  difference  from  and  relation  to
     other  signs.  Sounds  play  a  crucial  part  in  endowing  signs  with
     meanings  on  the  basis  of  differences.  For  example,  the  difference
     between  the  initial  sound  of  the  word  'dog'  and  the  initial  sound
     of  the  word  'fog'  is what  enables  us  to  give  each  word  a  different
     meaning.  These  basic  differences  in  sound  are  known  as  phonemic
     oppositions  (phonemes  are  basic  units  of  sound).  Any  two  words
     (like  'dog'  and  'fog')  differentiated  by  a  single  phoneme  are
     termed  minimal pairs. 2
       In  arguing  that  we can  only  grasp  signs  in  the  context  of  other
     signs,  Saussure  compares  language  to  the  game  of chess:  the  pieces
     on  the  board  do  not  mean  anything  outside  the  rules  of  the  game.


      **" The  relationship  between  sound  and  meaning  is discussed  in  Part  I,  Chapter
     1,  'Meaning'.

                                 17
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39