Page 85 - Critical and Cultural Theory
P. 85

LANGUAGE AND INTERPRETATION
    of  states  of  uncertainty.  In  challenging  the  solidity  of  our  textual
    frames,  the  abject  reminds  us  that  the  possibility  of  loss  looms
    large  over  our lives. However,  living with  loss -  and at a  loss - is
    not  a condition  of utter  despair.  In  fact, loss  is often  at  the  root of
    our  most  imaginative  efforts:  the  acknowledgment  of  our  self-
    division  and  incompleteness  encourages  us  to  go  on  constantly
    redefining  our  textual  selves  and  this  process  is  immensely
    creative.  Indeed,  it is comparable  to  artistic  production.
      In  Black  Sun,  Kristeva  actually  argues  that  a  powerful  means  of
    giving  the  experience  of  loss  a  form  is  art.  This  works  on  two
    levels.  On  the  one  hand,  the  creation  of  texts  is  a  means  of
    plugging  (albeit  tentatively) the  holes  that  riddle  our  lives. On  the
    other,  it  can  help  us  come  to  terms  with  loss  by  enabling  us  to
    relive  it  again  and  again.  In  the  construction  of  texts,  we  are
    productive  but  simultaneously  drain  our  bodies  and  minds.  Thus,
    artistic  creation  is  a  way  of  re-experiencing  the  initial  drama  of
    loss  from  which  all  subjectivity  stems.  The  inability  to  come  to
    terms  with  loss  would  result  in  melancholia  or  depression  -
    namely,  conditions  that  challenge  the  symbolic  by  rejecting
    socially  approved  forms  of  expression  and  communication  but
    also  impair  our  ability  to  relate  to  others  (Kristeva  1989).  By
    contrast  with  melancholia  and  depression,  love  is  posited  as  a
    means  of  forging  intersubjective  relations.  Like  Barthes,  Kristeva
    rejects  the  popular  tendency  to  domesticate  love  by turning  it  into
    a  love  story  with  a  beginning,  a  middle  and  an  end.  There  is
    nothing  challenging or  thought-provoking  about  such  a  narrative.
    It  is just  a  way  of  making  sense  of  love,  of  transforming  its fluid
    nature  into  a  neat  parcel  of  more  or  less  stereotypical  meanings.
    Genuine  love,  according  to  Kristeva,  is porous:  it means  openness
    to  the  other  and  an  ability to  dissolve  the  boundaries  of the indivi-
    dual  self (Kristeva  1987).
      The  text's  erotic  import  is  likewise  related  to  themes  of
    openness,  separation  and  loss.  As  we  have  seen,  Barthes  argues
    that  texts  come  across  as  most  intensely physical  and  sexual  when
    they gape -  i.e.  reveal  their  gaps  and fissures, their  divided  charac-
    ter,  what  is lost  to  them. Kristeva's  subject  is one  such text. In  her
    writings,  people  and  stories  become  virtually  interchangeable  in
    virtue  of their  common  nature.  Neither  the  text  nor  the  self can be
    anchored:  both  unfold  and  branch  off  in  disparate  directions  and
    with  no  obvious  destinations:  'The advantage  of  life  (or  a story) in

                                68
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90