Page 66 - Cultural Studies A Practical Introduction
P. 66

50                          Ideologies

                      Now  (1979) argues from a conservative perspective that liberals were too
                      weak to conduct foreign policy properly. The threat of enemies abroad
                      (mostly again, poor people ’ s movements for economic justice) required
                      toughness, viciousness, and the will to transcend both legal and human
                      laws and rules in order to defend the right of a small conservative minority
                      to over - accumulate social resources. Later, such arguments would be used
                      to justify the breach of international laws in regard to torture. Those later
                      arguments are already visible in  Apocalypse Now . The narrative is struc-
                      tured as a struggle between the heroic, conservative individualist and the
                      bureaucratic military establishment that serves as a metaphor for liberalism

                      throughout the film. A CIA assassin is assigned to go into the jungle to fi nd
                      Walter Kurtz, a renegade Special Forces colonel. The assassin is portrayed
                      as a lost soul who is weak and out of control at the start of the narrative.
                      As he pursues his assignment, he realizes that Kurtz is not a renegade; he

                      is in fact a genius who has figured out how to defeat the Communist insur-
                      gents in Vietnam by being vicious and by operating outside the rules of
                      war. Along the route of his journal, the assassin sees how ineffective the
                      American military is. In contrast, Kurtz is supremely effective, but to do
                      so, he has had to leave the military establishment behind. In the end, the
                      assassin becomes an initiate of Kurtz and carries out his assignment of
                      assassinating Kurtz with the needed viciousness. He then become Kurtz ’ s


                      replacement with his army of indigenous fighters. The film draws on myths
                      of the Fisher King, whereby an initiate kills the old king in order to replace
                      him, thus fulfi lling a cycle of death and rebirth.
                          Throughout, the indigenous insurgents are portrayed in a racist manner
                      as almost animalistic killers who serve as  a model for the conservative
                      argument of the film that one must leave liberal rules behind to succeed.

                      One must compete with viciousness. In one sequence, the regular military
                      attack a village known to be an insurgent headquarters. The sequence
                      depicts schoolchildren who would appear to seem innocent but in fact they
                      conceal insurgent killers who deceive and kill American soldiers. The motif
                      of the treachery of the adversary is common in conservative ideological
                      discourse largely because it is a mirror of conservative thinking itself, which
                      is inclined to be deceptive and to misrepresent reality for the purpose of
                      self - interest. The way this sequence is constructed is a good example of this
                      tendency. Americans are depicted as victims of treachery. A woman runs
                      toward one helicopter and throws a hidden grenade inside, killing a recently
                      wounded soldier. She is then chased down and killed. This sequence inverts
                      actual events such as the US attack on the village of My Lai, where over a
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71