Page 181 - Cultural Studies and Political Economy
P. 181

170                        Chapter Seven

           connections, that knowledge of proportions, and hence analogies stem. It is
           worth quoting McLuhan on this important insight:

             Perhaps the most precious possession of man is his abiding awareness of the
             analogy of proper proportionality, the key to all metaphysical insight and per-
             haps the very condition of consciousness itself. This analogical awareness is
             constituted of a perpetual play of ratios: A is to B what C is to D, which is to say
             that the ratio between A and B is proportioned to the ratio between C and D,
             there being a ratio between these ratios as well. This lively awareness of the
             most exquisite delicacy depends upon there being no connection whatever be-
             tween the components. If A were linked to B, or C to D, mere logic would take
             the place of analogical perception. 27

             In important ways, however, McLuhan departed from Innis. From his
           perspective as literary critic, McLuhan viewed media technologies as man-
           ifesting in the material world the same operations as those in the linguistic
           world described by the rhetorical term, chiasmus. McLuhan proposed that
           at high intensity, there is a reversal in a medium’s effects. Innis, to the con-
           trary, never argued that a space-binding medium pushed to the limit be-
           comes time-binding!
             McLuhan claimed that other rhetorical operations, too (metaphor, cliché,
           and archetype) have wide applicability in the nonverbal world. His justifi-
                                                                28
           cation for adopting this literary approach to media analysis was that language
           is a technology (i.e., an applied artifact), and hence it can properly be com-
           pared to other artifacts or technologies. “Anything that can be observed about
           the behavior of linguistic cliché or archetype,” he wrote, “can be found plen-
                                        29
           tifully in the nonlinguistic world.” McLuhan was fond of invoking the fol-
           lowing lines by the poet William Butler Yeats, to emphasize that poets and in-
           ventors (wordsmiths and technologists) are alike in recycling refuse to forge
           new creations:

                         Those masterful images because complete
                         Grew in pure mind, but out of what began?
                         A mound of refuse or the sweepings of a street,
                         Old kettles, old bottles, and a broken can,
                         Old iron, old bones, old rags, that raving slut
                         Who keeps the till. Now that my ladder’s gone,
                         I must lie down where all the ladders start,
                         In the foul rag-and-bone shop of the heart. 30

             Here, McLuhan’s position would seem to be not all that different from the
           poststructuralist notion of articulation. Hence, some might regard McLuhan
           as potentially a bridge between Innis and poststructuralism. To make that
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186