Page 96 - Cultural Studies and Political Economy
P. 96

Genealogy of Cultural Studies            85

               Radical literature, in any event, was a prominent means of fostering class
             consciousness and political awareness, and Thompson quoted Sherwin’s Po-
             litical Register (1817) as declaring: “If the Bible Societies, and the Sunday
             School societies have been attended to no other good, they have at least pro-
             duced one beneficial effect; they have been the means of teaching many thou-
             sands of children to read.” 148  Thompson noted it had been of some contro-
             versy in the Sunday Schools whether children should be taught to both read
             and write, or read only; while being able to read, it was felt, would increase
             working class children’s exposure to “proper” literature, being able to write
             might equip them to agitate more effectively when they grew up. As it turned
             out, the working class gravitated in any event to radical literature and the
             “great unstamped” periodicals (The Poor Man’s Guardian, Working Man’s
             Friend, Poor Man’s  Advocate) provided foundations for “emphatically a
             working class press.” 149  Thompson recounted that “at Barnsley as early as
             January 1816, a penny-a-month club of weavers was formed, for the purpose
             of buying Radical newspapers and periodicals.” 150  He recounted, too, that by
             1833, “at John Doherty’s famous ‘Coffee and Newsroom’ attached to his
             Manchester bookshop, no fewer than ninety-six newspapers were taken every
             week, including the illegal ‘unstamped,’” adding that “in the smaller towns
             and villages the reading-groups were less formal but no less important.” 151
             Thompson summarized:

               This was the culture—with its eager disputations around the booksellers’ stalls,
               in the taverns, workshops, and coffeehouses—which Shelley saluted in his
               “Song to the Men of England” and within which the genius of Dickens matured.
               . . . The working class ideology . . . put an exceptionally high value upon the
               rights of the press, of speech, of meeting and of personal liberty. 152

               Thompson judged that in no other country was the battle for press freedom
             identified as closely with the cause of the artisans and laborers as in England, 153
             making all the more ironic Hoggart’s observations concerning the bemusement
             with which working people after World War II scanned their newspapers—but
             by then, of course, the commercial press predominated. 154  For Thompson,
             though, in writing about the early-to-mid-nineteenth century, “the rights of a ‘free
             press’ were won in a campaign extending over fifteen or more years which has
             no comparison for its pigheaded, bloody-minded, and indomitable audacity.” 155
               Thompson insisted that “social relations” affect fundamentally the ways in
             which facts—events such as crop failures, floods, earthquakes, and business
             cycles—are worked out:

               Behind [a] trade cycle there is a structure of social relations, fostering some sorts
               of expropriation (rent, interest, and profit) and outlawing others (theft, feudal
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101