Page 228 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 228

202                                               D. Karrow and X. Fazio

            lamenting some arbitrary “fall from grace.” There is no moralizing tendency behind
            our argument. Rather we delve into the meaning of human existence and its relation
            with place as we currently experience it. Before concluding this section, it is necessary
            to  introduce  our  conception  of  PBE.  Although  we  have  already  argued  for  a
            conception of place-as-being, we articulate how this might relate to education.
              Meanings of place-as-land, place-as-community, or place-as-diversity share a
            commonality. They each approach the object of place from the standpoint of a
            subject, an irresistible modern habit. We wish, through our conception of PBE to
            dissolve this tendency by advocating for a blurring of the object/subject distinc-
            tion. This is accomplished, we believe, in a couple of ways. First, our philosophi-
            cal  position,  hermeneutic  phenomenology,  is  premised  upon  erasing  subject/
            object dichotomies. Second, the language we choose to “name” our conception of
            PBE is distinctly different. “Educating-within-place” appears hyphenated in an
            effort  to  convey  a  sense  of  ongoingness,  intimacy,  imbeddedness,  the  active,
            inevitable, evocation of the possible. Also, we hedge against using the word “edu-
            cation” as a noun as if something has occurred opting instead for “educating” as
            a verb, in an effort to convey the sense as described previously. Conveying a sense
            of the education’s dynamism Fox (1983) adds: “Education is ek-static, a move-
            ment beyond what already is, a reaching out to the new life around us in a way
            that keeps open the possibility ‘that people of this precious Earth ... may live’ ”
            (p. 9). Our use of language, in this way, may seem strange and peculiar; however,
            it is not without precedence. Speaking of the unusual character of Heidegger’s
            language, of some influence on us, Abram (1997) notes: “[H]e [Heidegger] is
            trying to avoid the use of nouns, of nominative forms that would freeze the tem-
            poral flux” (p. 212). All in all, educating-within-place is the conceptual structure
            reflecting  the  continual,  ongoing,  intermingling,  and  complex  phenomenon
                                           3
            between  place,  being,  and  educating.   It  is  not  something  acted  upon  a  place,
            rather something that occurs within place.



            NatureWatch and Place-Based Education


            To this point, we have introduced NatureWatch as an example of a citizen science
            program, explored various meanings of place and their influence upon PBE theory,
            and  advocated  for  a  conception  of  place-as-being  to  foreground  the  ontological
            realm  within  PBE  theory.  We  now  wish  to  illustrate  the  degree  to  which
            NatureWatch, as it is typically implemented, reflects aspects of current PBE theory.
            We recognize that in its existing form, NatureWatch does instill rudimentary experi-
            ences around place. There are, however, other place experiences of the ontological



            3 Our intent within this chapter is not to provide an account of the derivation of educating-within-
            place, but to elaborate theory around PBE by considering ontological realms. For a more detailed
            account of its origin, see D. D. Karrow (2003).
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233