Page 297 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 297

21  River Advocacy: Valuing Complex Systems as the Groundwork for River Relationships  271

            educators ought to seek reform that persuades every student to take responsibility
            for what occurs in our society and nature.
              Seeing the mine site and then reading subsequently about the fact that it was the way the
              mine was operated … what I read about was there was a lot of cyanide discharge they used
              to extract gold out of the mine waste, and that leaked out into the river so it got contami-
              nated for miles and miles downstream. I remember a sign saying, “Do not drink this water
              it is contaminated with heavy metals.” That’s something I remember pretty vividly. I guess
              that’s what got me interested in pursuing the things I do.” (Butch, Fig. 1)
            Let me explain. As suggested by Thayer-Bacon’s (2003) notions of “caring reason-
            ing,” Georgia river advocates develop a heightened awareness by paying attention to
            particular  rivers.  Consequently,  these  advocates  demonstrate  caring  thoughts  and
            emotions originating from their relationships and they appear to reflect on a realiza-
            tion of their own actions, that is, how they influence rivers, which motivate them to
            take  further  actions.  Their  different  views  regarding  their  personal  and  collective
            relationships  with  a  river  involve  transactional  exchanges,  or  pluralistic  ways  of
            engaging with a river. Although Georgia river advocates individually connect with
            rivers in unique and diverse ways, their commitment embodies the dualism between
            nature and self. They lack a clear and constant position on what their “place” in nature
            is – a term that characterizes the ongoing dialogue between a river advocate and a
            river. By achieving dialogue, a process through which advocates achieve a connection
            with rivers, advocates consider what it is to have regards for both self and the river.
            Though advocates appreciate rivers, they oscillate between whether to grant a river its
            “own rights” or to treat it as an object. Despite that, this oscillation dispels notions of
































            Fig. 1  A Georgia river advocate’s relationship with a polluted river (Butch). Visual data collected
            as part of a River Advocacy study
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302