Page 376 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 376

30  Considering the Consequences of Hybridity                   351

            A Question of “How to Get Back”


            Stacey:  This discussion of borders and indigenous knowledge reminds me of one
            of the many outings I had while living and teaching in a rural community in Alaska.
            It  was  the  Saturday  of  Easter  weekend,  clear  blue  skies  with  the  sun  shining
            brightly for 10 h or so a day, the wind blowing the bits of snow around that had
            been compacted because of the extreme cold. My good friend and co-teacher, a
            hunter and native to the North Slope, had offered to take me out and show me the
            tundra. I won’t bore you with the great details of layering myself, making sure I had
            my camera batteries charged, and waiting for my friend to show up on the snow
            machine. What I will share is the joy of bouncing over solid packed snow, moving
            at speeds I had not experienced in such a cold climate. I have vivid memories of
            stopping frequently so my friend could point out significant features of the land-
            scape, waving at a neighbor who was heading into the mountains for a day of
            hunting, and my curiosity at the rifle strapped across the front of my friend. In this
            part of the world, during this time of the year especially, being able to protect
            oneself from predators is important; polar bears come in early and hungry. As we
            flew across the flat land, miles out of town, the wind getting colder and stronger
            the further we traveled, we hit a bump. My friend stopped and I thought he was
            pointing out the “igloo” type wooden structure to our left. In actuality, he had
            stopped because the under-carriage of the snow machine had broken. It could not
            be fixed on the spot, there was no tow truck, and there was no ride back into
            town. We had a tense period of waiting, contemplating actions we could take, and
            discussing how to get “back.”
              I wonder if part of this notion of hybridity in relation to borders could be
            connected to the idea of how we get back. The connectedness that is often seen in
            native populations that utilize modern technologies alongside traditional methods
            is what would be referred to as hybridity; that ease in combining modern with old.
            While I know my friend was completely prepared for any event, I have to wonder
            if our reliance on modern tools and ideas has made us complacent. The example
            I have shared is clearly skewed heavily toward a perceived reliance on modern
            conveniences that are relatively new to this culture and community; a community
            that is supported by the land and survives because of knowledge and appreciation
            for the power of their surroundings. If we make border crossings and the notion of
            mixing cultural ideas so common that we become immune to the innate knowledge
            of survival and awareness – how do we get “back?”



            Protecting Ourselves from Predators


            Deb:  Stacey, your account of the Alaskan tundra experience highlights the ways
            in  which  hybridized  space  becomes  vulnerable.  Carter  and  Walker  assume  that
            knowledge  is  not  vulnerable  because  it  will  be  carried  forward  by  elders.  They
            address this point in their description of the elder who was asked whether Aboriginal
   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381