Page 50 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 50

26                                                R.A. Martusewicz et al.

            has been placed on modern science and technology that many expect that it will be
            only a matter of time until science solves all of the worlds’ problems (hunger, poverty,
            disease, war, etc.). And yet, we can trace some of the world’s most serious problems
            to modern science and technologies. We cannot fully understand the universe; we
            are born, live, and die like all living creatures and full control of the complexities
            of this situation is not possible. Work in science and thus science education, if it is
            to useful, needs to be rooted in local conditions and nested in a variety of systems
            of knowledge acknowledged for what they offer life, while understanding that we
            will never finally possess full knowledge of the universe.



            Notes


            We recognize the etymology of “drain” from Middle English as draynen, or from
            Old English drēahnian (see, e.g., Merriam Webster online: www.merriam-webster.
            com/dictionary/drain). The word in current usage has multiple meanings. On the
            one hand, it refers to the movement or flow of water over a landscape or in a water-
            shed away from its source. It is also used to mean a device used to move waste away
            from where we live or work, as in a sewer pipe. When these two usages are convo-
            luted as analogues for one another we see the ways the word “drain” functions
            within a mechanistic discourse or mindset. Specifically, when we begin to assume
            that a body of water like a stream which is a living system can or should function
            as  a  sewer,  we  are  employing  mechanism  as  a  discourse  to  reduce  nature  to  a
            machine. In this sense, mechanism is very detrimental because it fails to acknowl-
            edge living relationships in that which it defines as an inert machine.




            References

            Apffel-Marglin,  F.,  with  PRATEC.  (1998).  Spirit  of  regeneration:  Andean  culture  confronting
              western notions of development. London/New York: Zed Books.
            Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
            Berman, M. (1981). The reenchantment of the world. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
            Berry, W. (2000). Life is a miracle: An essay in modern superstition. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.
            Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial: Why the environmental movement needs a strategy
              for reforming universities and public schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
            Bowers, C. A. (1999). Changing the dominant cultural perspective in education. In G. Smith &
              D. Willams (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the
              environment (pp. 161–178). Albany: State University of New York Press.
            Bowers, C. A. (2006). Revitalizing the commons: Cultural and educational sites of resistance and
              affirmation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
            Bowers, C. A. & Martusewicz, R. (2008). Eco-Justice pedagogy and the revitalization of the commons.
              In E. Provenzo Jr. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the social and cultural foundations of education
              (Vol. 1, pp. 272–279). New York: Sage.
            Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2008). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity.
              New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55