Page 246 - Culture Media Language Working Papers in Cultural Studies
P. 246

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AT THE CENTRE 235

            centrality to autobiographical and fictional forms, and to the awareness of sexism
                                 36
            in textual  representations,   in ways from  which  too much theoretical  work,
            uninterested in gender, has stood separate.
              Here we look briefly at three sets of questions: (1) the development of literary
            theory in relation to the uneven and  divided situations of  those teaching at
            different levels of the education system; (2) the rapid development of new kinds
            of cultural practice scarcely yet described, let alone assessed; (3) the uniquely
            strong position  of  feminist work within  the contradictory space  between
            educational work and cultural practice.


                                Education and English studies
            It has been an important paradox that while ‘English’ has inevitably been caught
            within the ever-extending processes of certification and qualification dominating
            the post-war growth of the state education system, it has also been at all levels
            the most open and ambiguous disciplinary space. But definitions and aims have
            diverged sharply and now make up a peculiar pyramid.
              At  its apex,  the university ‘discipline’  of English has remained nearly
            inviolate. Since the founding days of Sussex, contemporary or interdisciplinary
            work has scarcely been contemplated by  universities able to claim financial
            stringencies or to shelter under the convenient doctrine of the ‘binary’ system. In
            English departments the intellectual consequences of a now eroded confidence in
            untheorized readings (‘we feel that….’) have gone little beyond a skirmish with
            linguistics. Mainstream criticism no longer treats the great tradition as a unique
            repository  of moral values, but  it gets  by in practice (despite  an overall
            impression of directionlessness,  combined with a modishly brisk,  colloquial
            manner) with an  eclectic  pluralism of approaches (the sociological, the
            psychological, the biographical, the formalist, the bibliographical, and so on, ad
            nauseam),  which,  because they lack a  thorough literary historical grounding,
            make literary texts appear to be arbitrarily selected out of, or ‘naturally’ given by,
            the ‘literary tradition’ itself. Other work has remained isolated, carelessly under-
            organized, except in the productive literature/ society conferences at Essex, or
            politely absorbed: ‘context’ and ‘new directions’ often remain old ‘background’
            writ  large. And as Rée remarked  in another context:  ‘British philosophy  still
            exists…. Radical Philosophy relates to it decreasingly; it is uninterested; and the
            feeling is mutual.’ 37
              In the polytechnics there has been an effective movement away from the great
            tradition, by way of combined or integrated degrees or by routes into degrees in
            Communications, Media or Cultural Studies. The results have included a much
            wider range of texts thought worth study, detailed historical work in connection
            with the analysis and a greater openness to theoretical questions, even though
            ‘readings’ and debates rooted in the literary field have remained central. This
            work, if still corralled by the general vulnerability of the polytechnics, has had a
            considerable effect upon its first generation of graduates. In its wake a range of new
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251