Page 126 - Culture Society and Economy
P. 126

Robotham-06.qxd  1/31/2005  6:24 PM  Page 119






                                                           NETWORK SOCIETY THEORY

                little class conflict. This body of thought was a communitarian emendation
                of Weber’s famous thesis to allow for the possibility of a capitalism with a
                more communitarian rationality to emerge from the religious ethics of the
                East. To this extent there is a real connection between multiple modernity
                and network society theory in so far as both yearn for the preservation
                of some form of communitarianism.
                  Indeed, it was claimed that East Asia showed that such communitarian
                ‘economies of signs and space’ might be more effectively modern – more
                rationalistic, purely from the point of view of productivity and scientific
                                      61
                and technical rationality. Monopoly capitalism was being superseded by
                this new model of capitalism which, because of its proven competitive
                superiority, was becoming a worldwide trend. ‘Reverse convergence’ – the
                Anglo-American economy converging towards the Japanese model – was
                becoming the order of the day. 62
                  Initially, because of the work of Dore, in particular in the pioneering
                British Factory, Japanese Factory, and in other works on Japanese ‘relational
                contracting’, this idea gained currency – that a really radically new pro-
                duction system had emerged in Asia which resolved the age-old social
                conflicts of capitalism as well as being more productive and efficient. 63
                Today this idealizing of the Japanese production system may seem far-
                fetched, after the collapse of the ‘Bubble Economy’ in the early 1990s and
                the prolonged deflationary crisis from which Japan is only now finally
                emerging. But one must remember the context in which Dore conducted
                his research. This was, above all, in a context defined by the failure of the
                nationalization policies of the British Labour governments of the 1960s
                and the seemingly inexorably stagnation and then decline of British
                manufacturing and the British economy as a whole. It was in the face of this
                intractable ‘British disease’ – the anarchy of shop floor strikes, the incom-
                petence and disaster at British Leyland – that Dore turned his attention to
                Japan. He was astonished at the contrast in the state of affairs in Japanese
                production systems even from this early date – well before it became fash-
                ionable in Western business circles to make the pilgrimage to Japan. 64
                  The sense was that the Japanese or Italian models held out the hope
                of an apparent supersession of the age-old contradictions of monopoly
                capitalism. A new era which combined modernity with community was
                evolving from within the womb of capitalism itself in which the rational-
                istic potential of capitalism would be realized at the collective level – for
                the benefit of society as a whole. It is this claim which is the source of the
                appeal of multiple modernity. I would argue that multiple modernity theory
                is less communitarian and more rationalistic in comparison to network
                society theory. This is readily apparent if one carefully compares the work


                                               119
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131