Page 48 - Culture Society and Economy
P. 48

Robotham-02.qxd  1/31/2005  6:21 PM  Page 41






                                                   POLITICS AS CULTURE: STUART HALL

                essence of this historically created synthesis, if such a synthesis is
                thought to exist at all? What are the historical forces which have shaped
                it and continue to shape it today? The fact that black popular culture in
                the West is a historical product hardly means that it is contentless, that it
                is simply oppositional, that it has no constructive distinctive essence of
                its own, born from its specific aspirations and struggles. As Hegel argued
                long ago, essence is inherently historical and unfolds as the result of a
                struggle of the spirit. Reliance on a semiotic view of cultural differences
                carries the inherent danger of draining each culture of its distinctive, his-
                torically determined specificity and reducing it to one in a series of oppo-
                sitions which have only internal referents. Cultures then become one in
                a system of arbitrary oppositions. In other words, such an approach leads
                to the view of cultural difference as inherently without substance in the
                objective socio-historical sense.
                  Moreover, Hall, although he affirms the complexity of the subject,
                emphasizes one particular version of the historicity of black culture – a
                truncated one which is familiarly held by many anthropologists as well as
                by the upper middle class which controls the state and cultural life in
                             42
                the Caribbean. This is the idea of African-Caribbean culture as a ‘creole’
                culture. The dominant strata of this brown-black upper middle class is
                ‘hybrid’ in the sense that it self-consciously presents itself as an amalgam
                of ‘Africa’ and ‘Europe’ – but more the latter than the former. It likes to
                think of itself as representing ‘the best of both worlds’ and therefore with
                an inherent right to rule over the masses of the black population. 43  The
                black working class and peasantry and increasingly the newer Caribbean
                black middle class and bourgeoisie out of which Rastafarianism, Reggae
                and Dancehall spring, however, perceive and present themselves quite dif-
                ferently. They resolutely identify as ‘African’ or ‘true Jamaican’ (as distinct
                from the brown-skinned, white, Chinese, Jewish and Lebanese elite).
                Similarly vital class and colour distinctions in culture exist in the African-
                Caribbean population in Britain, within the staunchly Pentecostal peasant
                culture of the Windrush migrants as well as with respect to the far less
                visible and tiny secular brown-black middle class. As often is the case in
                discussions of black culture in the West, there is a strange silence on the
                issue of class differences among black people and its consequences for
                internal cultural difference. In other words, one needs to speak of black
                popular cultures, not culture and delineate their class content and position
                within a certain broad unity. One must, as Hegel may have put it, give all
                the determinations of ‘black culture’ their due.
                  Alternative and far richer conceptions of black cultural historicity
                exist, other than this simple two-segment static model in which, in any


                                               41
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53