Page 67 - Culture Society and Economy
P. 67

Robotham-03.qxd  1/31/2005  6:23 PM  Page 60






                     CULTURE, SOCIETY AND ECONOMY

                     him to move in an anti-imperialist direction. Garveyite anti-imperialism
                     was expressed in the well-known slogan ‘Africa for the Africans, at Home
                     and Abroad’ which all the Great Powers regarded as subversive and
                     which brought him and his followers into direct confrontation with
                     imperialist forces, at home and abroad.
                        Given only the vague grasp of the significance of imperialism, it is
                     difficult for Gilroy to give a coherent account of the work of either DuBois
                     or Richard Wright. For it is obvious that both are products of a different era
                     from that of Delany. Theirs is not the mid-Victorian period of bourgeois
                     liberalism, optimism and Free Trade during which the Civil War was
                     fought and emancipation from slavery won. Nor is it the period of Black
                     Reconstruction which followed. DuBois and Wright are products of the
                     collapse of Reconstruction, the rise of the robber barons, the deracination
                     of the rural black population in the South and the mass migration to
                     Northern cities. This is one and the same process which leads to the Italian
                     migrations to America, to the McKinley Tariff, to the Homestead Strike, to
                     the ‘big stick’ policy of Theodore Roosevelt, to the Spanish-American War,
                     the entry of the United States into World War I and the emergence of
                     America as an imperial Great Power at Versailles in 1919. DuBois analyses
                     this process sociologically and politically, Wright depicts it in his novels.
                        Wright is the chronicler of the saga of the deracinated black peasant
                     from Mississippi who flees Jim Crow in the South only to encounter the
                     all-powerful racism of the North. Wright understands well the experience
                     of deracination and presents fierce and powerful characterizations of the
                     inner rage which it produces in its black victims. But Wright does not
                     understand the emergence of a different kind of black person out of this
                     capitalist cauldron. This is a person driven not by ressentiment – by bitter-
                     ness and rage springing from the experience of seeing the entire social
                     and personal basis of their life destroyed while being powerless to do
                     anything much about it. This newer consciousness was to be found in the
                     black person who is rooted in Northern industrial society and who is
                     located at the heart of the very process of capitalist production – in some
                     of its most important industrial enterprises. Such a black person is driven
                     not by rage at what has been lost but by hope for what can be. The per-
                     sonal and social psychology is different and is generally not to be found
                     in Wright’s works.
                        It is in this sense that Wright’s artistic power can be said to have
                     declined when he went to live in Paris. Wright’s dilemma derived not
                     simply from being an American in Paris but was more specific, as Arna
                     Bontemps long ago pointed out. 51  Bontemps made the telling point that
                     Wright’s alienation derived from being rooted in the poverty and racial


                                                     60
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72