Page 68 - Culture Technology Communication
P. 68

Understanding Micropolis and Compunity





                                      Steve Jones








             In my book CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and
             Community (Jones 1995), I argued that terms commonly used in the
             US to describe the Internet such as “information highway” and “na-
             tional information infrastructure” are unfortunate but telling
             metaphors. They bring with them much intellectual and social bag-
             gage, largely due to the startling parallels between the current proj-
             ect, this “information superhighway,” and the one spurred on in the
             US by both World Wars, the interstate highway system—not the
             least of which is the reliance on the word “highway” and the roman-
             tic connotations of the open road. Another important parallel is the
             military origin of highway building [as established by Thomas Jef-
             ferson, among others (Patton 1986)] and the military origins of what
             is presently the most prominent information highway, the Internet,
             in Defense Department computer networks linked to university re-
             search centers. And yet another parallel is to the 1960s “space race”
             and our quest to lead in new technologies and science.
                 And race ahead we do. I think racing, to push the motoring
             metaphor, serves well to characterize a social bias based, in essence,
             on movement itself. We can acknowledge several things that com-
             pose it; competitive spirit perhaps, a modern need for mobility also,
             and curiosity as well. It is a movement based on speed, rooted in
             transportation, and oblivious in large part to that which is trans-
             ported. To put it another way, loyalty is to the movement of some-
             thing (often ourselves, but not always) from one place to another, to
             flow, and not to that which is being moved (the last word’s double-
             entendre intended), to content.
                 I believe this quest for movement is well-illustrated by our early
             understanding of electricity, and can be most easily recognized in the
             work of Nikola Tesla (Cheney 1981). In the late 1890s Tesla envi-
             sioned a world linked by electricity. He proposed the development of


                                           53
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73