Page 195 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 195

He, She, and (S)he  171

            Masculine culture countries strive for a performance society; feminine
        countries for a welfare society. They get what they pay for: in 1994–95,
        across ten developed industrial countries for which data were available,
        the share of the population living in poverty varied from 4.3 percent in
        feminine Norway to 17.6 percent in masculine Australia. In the period
        1992–2002, across eighteen developed countries, the share of the popula-
        tion earning less than half the median income varied from 5.4 percent in
        Finland to 17.0 percent in the United States. The share of functional illiter-
        ates (people who completed school but in actual fact cannot read or write)
        across thirteen developed countries varied from 7.5 percent in Sweden to
                            59
        22.6 percent in Ireland.  In all three cases the percentages were strongly
        correlated with MAS. 60
            In criticisms by politicians and journalists from masculine countries
        such as the United States and Great Britain versus feminine countries such
        as Sweden and the Netherlands, strong and very different value positions
        appear. There is a common belief in, for example, the United States that
        economic problems in Sweden and the Netherlands are due to high taxes,
        while there is a belief in feminine European countries that economic prob-
        lems in the United States are due to too much tax relief for the rich. Tax
        systems, however, do not just happen: they are created by politicians as a
        consequence of preexisting value judgments. Most Swedes feel that society
        should provide a minimum quality of life for everyone. It is normal that

        the financial means to that end are collected from those in society who
        have them. Even conservative politicians in northwestern Europe do not
        basically disagree with this view, only with the extent to which it can be
        realized.
            The northwestern European welfare state is not a recent invention.
        The French philosopher Denis Diderot, who visited the Netherlands in

        1773–74, described both the high taxes and the absence of poverty as a
        consequence of welfare payments, good medical care for all, and high stan-
        dards of public education: “The poor in hospitals are well cared for: They
        are each put in a separate bed.” 61

            The performance versus welfare antithesis is reflected in views about
        the causes of poverty. A survey in the European Union countries included
        the following question: “Why, in your opinion, are there people who live
        in need? Here are four opinions; which is the closest to yours? (1) Because
        they have been unlucky; (2) Because of laziness and lack of willpower; (3)
        Because there is much injustice in our society; (4) It is an inevitable part of
        modern progress.” Across twelve European Union member states, the per-
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200