Page 226 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 226

What Is Different Is Dangerous  199

        society, orderliness and consistency are stressed, even at the expense of
        experimentation and innovation” (disagree) and “In this society, societal
        requirements and instructions are spelled out in detail so citizens know
        what they are expected to do” (disagree). Basically, where we measured
        strong uncertainty avoidance, GLOBE respondents say there is no order
        and there are no detailed instructions in their society. 10
            GLOBE’s uncertainty avoidance “should be” was primarily correlated
        not with our UAI but with our PDI. In Chapter 3 we noted that GLOBE’s
        power distance “as is” and “should be” both correlated better with our UAI
        than with our PDI. It seems the meanings of our power and uncertainty
        dimensions and those of GLOBE have been at least partly reversed. 11
            Examples of GLOBE questions associated with uncertainty avoid-
        ance “should be” are “I believe that orderliness and consistency should be
        stressed, even at the expense of experimentation and innovation” (agree)
        and “I believe that societal requirements and instructions should be spelled
        out in detail so citizens know what they are expected to do” (agree). These
        statements are primarily found in countries that in our studies score a large
        power distance. 12
            GLOBE’s uncertainty avoidance measures therefore present no alter-
        native for our UAI. In Chapter 3 we saw that GLOBE’s power distance
        measures presented no alternative for our PDI. GLOBE’s use of the terms
        power distance and uncertainty avoidance just confuses the concepts.

        Uncertainty Avoidance According to
        Occupation, Gender, and Age

        It is easy to imagine occupations that are more uncertainty avoiding versus
        less so (such as bank clerk versus journalist). Nevertheless, the analysis of

        the IBM data across the thirty-eight available occupations did not permit
        the use of the UAI for characterizing occupations. The reason is that the
        three questions used to compute the index for countries (stress, rule orien-
        tation, and intent to stay) had different meanings for different occupations,
        so that across occupations, the three were not correlated. Anybody who
        wants to measure the amount of uncertainty avoidance in occupations will
        have to use other questions.
            The same holds for gender differences. Women and men in the same
        countries and occupations showed exactly the same stress levels and rule
        orientation. Only their intent to stay differed (men on average wanting
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231