Page 453 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 453

418   IMPLICATIONS

        the donor side, however, the situation is not always better. Many develop-
        ment agencies have grown out of the foreign service, the main objective
        of which is the promotion of the donor country’s interests abroad. Diplo-
        mats lack both the skills and the organizational culture to act as success-
        ful entrepreneurs for development consulting activities. Development aid
        money often has political strings attached to it: it has to be spent in a way

        that satisfies the values, if not the interests, of the donor country citizens
        and politicians, whether or not such values are shared by citizens and poli-
        ticians at the receiving end. Projects funded by international agencies such
        as the World Bank in theory do not have this constraint, but they have to

        satisfy the agency’s objectives, which often also conflict with the receivers’
        objectives. 40
            The institutional problem at the receiving end is the most serious for
        countries in which traditional institutional frameworks did not survive
        colonization and decolonization. Most of these lie in sub-Saharan Africa.
        Even when local wars do not destroy the products of peaceful development,

        forces in society make development difficult to attain. Without institu-
        tional traditions, personal interests can prevail unchecked. Politicians are
        out to enrich themselves and their families without being controlled by
        traditional norms. Institutions cannot be created from scratch: they are
        living arrangements, rooted in values and history, which have to grow.
        The economic success of certain countries of East Asia owes much to the
        fact that centuries-old institutional frameworks existed that were adapted
        to modern times.
            Development cooperation has suffered from various implicit models of
        how organizations should function (see Chapter 9) between donor and host
        country technicians.
            Take the story of a German engineering firm installing an irrigation

        system in an African country. Overcoming serious technical diffi culties,

        the engineers constructed an effective and easy-to-operate system. They
        provided all the necessary documentation for later use and repairs, trans-
        lated into English and Swahili. Then they left. Four months later the sys-
        tem broke down, and it was never repaired. The local authority structure
        had not had an opportunity to adopt the project as its family property; the
        project had no local “master.” 41
            A classic study sponsored by the Canadian International Development
        Agency looked at factors determining the effectiveness of donor country
        personnel overseas. It covered 250 Canadian expatriates in six host coun-
   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458