Page 70 - Cultures and Organizations
P. 70

More Equal than Others  55

        Measuring the Degree of Inequality in Society:
        The Power Distance Index

        Not only Sweden and France but other nations as well can be distinguished
        by the way they tend to deal with inequalities. The research among IBM
        employees in similar positions but in differ ent countries has allowed us
        to assign to each of these countries a score indicating its level of power
        distance. Power distance is one of the dimensions of national cultures intro-

        duced in Chapter 2. It reflects the range of answers found in the various
        countries to the basic question of how to handle the fact that people are
        unequal. It derives its name from research by a Dutch experimental social
        psychologist, Mauk Mulder, into the emotional distance that separates sub-
        ordinates from their bosses. 1
            Scores on power distance for fifty countries and three multicountry

        regions have been calculated from the answers by IBM employees in the
        same kind of positions on the same survey questions. All questions were of
        the precoded-answer type so that answers could be represented by a score
        number: usually 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Standard samples composed of respondents
        from the same mix of jobs were taken from each country. A mean score
        was computed for each sample (say, 2.53 as the mean score for country X
        and 3.43 for country Y), or the percentage of people choosing particular
        answers was computed (say, 45 percent of the sample choosing answer 1 or
        2 in country X and 33 percent in country Y). From that data, a table was
        composed presenting mean scores or percentages for each question and for
        all countries.
            A statistical procedure (factor analysis) was used to sort the survey
        questions into groups, called factors or clusters, for which the mean scores
        or percentages varied together.  This meant that if a country scored high
                                   2
        on one of the questions from the cluster, it also could be expected to score

        high on the others; likewise, it could be expected to score not high but low
        for questions carrying the opposite meaning. If, on the other hand, a coun-
        try scored low on one question from the cluster, it also would most likely
        score low on the others and score high on questions formulated the other
        way around. If a country scored average on one question from the cluster,
        it probably would score average on all of them.
            One of the clusters found was composed of questions that all seemed to
        have something to do with power and (in)equality. From the questions in
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75