Page 335 - Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications
P. 335

314  5 / Induction and Recursion



























                                                FIGURE 2    Illustrating How Mathematical Induction Works Using Dominoes.


                                                WAYS TO REMEMBER HOW MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION WORKS Thinking of
                                                the infinite ladder and the rules for reaching steps can help you remember how mathematical
                                                induction works. Note that statements (1) and (2) for the infinite ladder are exactly the basis
                                                step and inductive step, respectively, of the proof that P (n) is true for all positive integers n,
                                                where P (n) is the statement that we can reach the nth rung of the ladder. Consequently, we can
                                                invoke mathematical induction to conclude that we can reach every rung.
                                                    Another way to illustrate the principle of mathematical induction is to consider an infinite
                                                row of dominoes, labeled 1, 2, 3,...,n,... , where each domino is standing up. Let P (n) be
                                                the proposition that domino n is knocked over. If the first domino is knocked over—i.e., if P(1)
                                                is true—and if, whenever the kth domino is knocked over, it also knocks the (k + 1)st domino
                                                over—i.e., if P(k) → P(k + 1) is true for all positive integers k—then all the dominoes are
                                                knocked over. This is illustrated in Figure 2.



                                                Why Mathematical Induction is Valid

                                                Why is mathematical induction a valid proof technique? The reason comes from the well-
                                                ordering property, listed in Appendix 1, as an axiom for the set of positive integers, which
                                                states that every nonempty subset of the set of positive integers has a least element. So, suppose
                                                we know that P(1) is true and that the proposition P(k) → P(k + 1) is true for all positive
                                                integers k. To show that P (n) must be true for all positive integers n, assume that there is at
                                                least one positive integer for which P (n) is false. Then the set S of positive integers for which
                                                P(n) is false is nonempty. Thus, by the well-ordering property, S has a least element, which
                                                will be denoted by m. We know that m cannot be 1, because P(1) is true. Because m is positive
                                                and greater than 1, m − 1 is a positive integer. Furthermore, because m − 1 is less than m,itis
                                                not in S,so P(m − 1) must be true. Because the conditional statement P(m − 1) → P(m) is
                                                also true, it must be the case that P(m) is true. This contradicts the choice of m. Hence, P(n)
                                                must be true for every positive integer n.



                                                The Good and the Bad of Mathematical Induction

                                                An important point needs to be made about mathematical induction before we commence a
                                                study of its use. The good thing about mathematical induction is that it can be used to prove
   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340