Page 387 - Design for Environment A Guide to Sustainable Product Development
P. 387

362    C h a p t er  T w enty

               perhaps meaningless, to study industrial systems in isolation. The
               need to draw appropriate system boundaries is a barrier to complex
               systems modeling; for example, one impediment to the Kyoto Pro-
               tocol is the  potential for carbon “leakage” across borders due to
               economic imbalances between participating countries. Apart from
               connectivity and complexity, another barrier is the high degree of
               uncertainty that is inherent in large-scale complex systems. The tur-
               bulence of natural, political, and economic forces exceeds our ability
               to predict the outcomes of our actions with any confidence. Who
               could have anticipated the sequence of events that swept through
               the United States in the early twenty-first century, including the Sep-
               tember 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center, the devastation of
               Hurricane Katrina, and the economic collapse of 2008? Plans for sus-
               tainable growth need to be based on assumptions about the future,
               but assumptions are often dead on arrival. In a time of turbulence
               and discontinuity, old business models based on precision, stability,
               and repeatable processes are no longer viable.


          Toward Resilient Enterprise Systems
               A number of multinational companies are trying to incorporate a
               broader systems perspective into their enterprise risk management
               programs. However, the traditional risk management approach is
               predicated on identifying threats and reducing their likelihoods or
               consequences. It is not effective for dealing with obscure threats that
               are difficult to anticipate and quantify. Faced with a dynamic and
               unpredictable business environment, some companies have aban-
               doned traditional approaches to risk management and strategic plan-
               ning in favor of a more flexible, resilient approach [10]. Enterprise
               resilience can be defined as the  capacity for an enterprise to survive,
               adapt, and grow in the face of turbulent change. According to the Council
               on Competitiveness, innovation, enterprise resilience, and sustain-
               ability are the three cornerstones of economic competitiveness and
               value creation [11].
                   Enterprises need to grow, just as natural organisms do, and the
               concept of a static, no-growth enterprise is unrealistic in the business
                                    world. Enterprises can learn much from
                                    natural ecosystems, in which individual crea-
                RESILIENCE WILL ENABLE
                                    tures and entire species are engaged in a
                ENTERPRISES TO REMAIN
                                    constant struggle for food, security, survival,
                  COMPETITIVE AND
                                    and growth. In a complex, connected, and
               ACHIEVE THEIR LONG-TERM
                                    uncertain world, resilience is a fundamental
                SUSTAINABILITY GOALS.
                                    attribute that enables both biological and
                                    human systems to cope successfully with
               continual waves of change. Resilience can be seen in many contexts—
               in forests and wetlands that recover from devastation, in cities that
   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392