Page 264 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 264

234   Chapter Seven







                                Direction of Improvement  % of Employees Trained  Close the Deal Cycle Time  Prospecting Cycle Time
               Direction of Improvement  Use of Standardized Documents and Tools Updating of Customer Account Data  Importance of the Part Attributes  Relative Importance of Part Attributes
                Maximize   1.0             Discovery Cycle Time
                Target   0.0            Systems Uptime  Setup Cycle Time  Target Values
                Minimize   –1.0
                                1  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  1  2  3
            Direction of Improvement  1
            First Call Resolution %  1            5103.0 15.8 = 80% First Call Resolution  1
            % Svc. Req. Res. by Promise Date  2   5004.0 15.5 100% of Service Requests Resolved by Promise Date  2
            % Total Portfolio Reviewed/Year  3    4266.0 13.2 10%          3
            % Discovery Document Complete  4      3618.0 11.2 100%         4
            Sales Cycle Time  5                   1911.0 5.9 60 Days       5
            Customer Satisfaction Rating  6       3927.0 12.1              6
            % AM/CSAs >= 2 Competency Model  7    3159.0 9.8 80%           7
            Average Speed of Answer  8            1278.0 4.0 80% of Calls Answered in < 24 Seconds  8
            Losses Due to Price  9                1356.0 4.2 < 10%         9
            % CSAs >= 27 Call Coaching  10        2718.0 8.4 80%          10
                                  647.7  590.3  483.3  443.7  202.9
            Importance of Process Attributes  1  89.6  89.6  53.2
                                    Used 90% of the Time 22.7  95% System Update  Moderate  3.0
            Relative Importance of Process Attributes 2  24.9  18.6  17.1  7.8  3.4  3.4  2.0  Standard 9-3-1
            Target Values    3                          Strong  9.0
                                                        Weak
                                                               1.0
                                  100%  Nightly Update  10 Days  45 Days  12 Days  5 Days
                                  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8
           Figure 7.9 Phase 3 QFD, third house of quality, process planning matrix.





           total design. Change in these characteristics will greatly affect the
           design, and such effect propagates via the correlation matrix to other
           CTSs, causing positive and negative implications.The following CTSs are
           significant as implied by their importance ratings and number of “9”
           ratings in their relationships to WHATs: “Meet the expectations,” “Know
           my business and offers,” “Save money/enhance productivity,” “Do it right
           the first time,” and “Know our products and processes.” Examining the
           correlation matrix (Fig. 7.10), we have positive correlation all over except
           in the cell “Do it right the first time” and “Meet time expectations.”

           Eye Openers. The DFSS team should look at customer attributes
           where
           1. Their design as well as their competitors are performing poorly
   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269