Page 54 - Designing Sociable Robots
P. 54

breazeal-79017  book  March 18, 2002  13:58





                       Insights from Developmental Psychology                                35





                       short pauses of varying duration. At other times she presents a series of markedly different
                       acts or vocalizations that occupy nearly identical time slots. This simplifies the complexity of
                       the stimulus the infant encounters by holding many of the features fairly constant while only
                       varying a small number. This also helps to make the caregiver’s behavior more predictable
                       for the infant.
                       Timing and contingency  During social interactions, the caregiver adjusts the timing of
                       her responses to make her responses contingent upon those of her infant, and to make his
                       responses seemingly contingent upon hers. To accomplish this, she is very aware of her
                       infant’s physiological and psychological limitations and carefully observes him to make
                       adjustments in her behavior. For instance, when talking with her infant she fills his pauses
                       with her own utterances or gestures, and purposely leaves spaces between her own repetitive
                       utterances and gestures for him to fill (Newson, 1979). She intently watches and listens for
                       newinitiativesfromhim,andimmediatelypauseswhenshethinksthatheisabouttorespond.
                       By doing so, she tries to establish or prolong a run of alternations between herself and her
                       infant, sustaining his interest, and trying to get him to respond contingently to her (Kaye,
                       1979). During the interchange, each partner’s movements and vocalizations demonstrate
                       strong synchronization both within their turn and even across turns (Collis, 1979). Namely,
                       the infant entrains to the caregiver’s speech and gestures, and vice versa. This helps to
                       establish an overall rhythm to the interplay, making it smoother and more synchronized
                       over time.
                       Establishing games  It is important that each caregiver and infant pair develop its own
                       set of conventional games. To paraphrase Kaye (1979), these games serve as the foundation
                       of future communication and language-learning skills. They establish the process of defining
                       conventions and roles, set up a mutual topic-comment format, and impose consistency and
                       predictability on dyadic routines. These ritualized structures assist the infant in learning how
                       to anticipate when and how a partner’s behavior will change. Much of the social experience
                       the infant is exposed to comes in the form of games. In general, games serve as an important
                       form of scaffolding for infants.
                         From these scaffolded interactions, the infant very quickly learns how to socially ma-
                       nipulate people who care about him and for him. For instance, he learns how to get their
                       attention, to playfully engage them, and to elicit nurturing responses from them. This is pos-
                       sible because his caregiver’s scaffolding acts continually allow him to experience a higher
                       level of functioning than he could achieve on his own. As he learns the significance his
                       actions have for others, these initiatives become more deliberate and intentional. He also
                       gradually begins to take on a more equal role in the interaction. For instance, he begins
                       to adjust his timing, imitate his caregiver, and so forth (Tronick et al., 1979). As noted by
                       Kaye (1979, p. 204), “This in turn gives him even finer control over the adult’s behavior, so
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59