Page 24 - Living Room WarsDesprately Seeking the Audience Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World
P. 24

Desperately seeking the audience     12
        Laclau and Mouffe 1985). Indeed, if ‘television  audience’  exists  nowhere,  actual
        audiences are everywhere (Lull 1988b:242)!
           The theoretical distinction between the social world of actual audiences (as I define it)
        and discursive constructs of ‘television audience’ is an extremely important one: as we
        will see, it is the tension between the two that accounts for the basic precariousness of the
        institutional point of view, which forms a red thread through the analyses in the pages to
        come. The distinction also clarifies why in the end knowledge of ‘television audience’,
        constructed from the institutional point of view, will only make us lose sight of the
        intricacies of the social world of actual audiences, of what Edward Said (1985:5) would
        call the ‘brute reality’ of audiencehood in the modern, television-saturated world we all
        live in.
           If we are to come to an understanding that does justice to the dynamic complexities of
        the social world of actual audiences—an understanding that is ‘on their side’, as it were
        (Nightingale 1986)—we must, to begin with, recognize the fundamental irreducibility of
        this ‘brute reality’ to any attempt to contain it in an objectified construct of ‘television
        audience’  as  a  category of others to be controlled. Hayden White (1978:5) has
        characterized  understanding as ‘a process  of rendering the unfamiliar… familiar; of
        removing it from the domain of things felt to be “exotic”  and  unclassified.’  What  it
        comes down to, I suggest, is to find new ways of making the unfamiliar familiar, or more
        precisely, to make something that is so familiar in our everyday lives but has retained an
        ‘exotic’ quality nevertheless, also familiar at the level of  understanding,  knowledge,
        discourse. This book is an attempt to chart the terrain for such a project by removing the
        epistemological and political obstacles we are liable to encounter along the road.
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29