Page 33 - Living Room WarsDesprately Seeking the Audience Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World
P. 33

2
                  Audience-as-market and audience-as-
                                        public



        So far, I have unproblematically described the operation of the television institution in
        commercial terms. But of course the institutional arrangement of television broadcasting
        is not always based upon commercial principles. While the United States is the home of
        the most full-fledged commercial system, the  nation-states of Western Europe are  the
        historical  base  of  a  range of public service broadcasting systems, embodied by state-
        regulated and collectively-financed organizations such as the British  BBC,  the  Italian
        RAI, or the Dutch ‘pillarized’ system (see e.g. Kuhn 1985). The two systems are both
        formally  built  upon the communicative framework of broadcasting, but they differ
        fundamentally as regards assumptions about  the cultural and political purpose of
        broadcasting, and this difference is inextricably linked to a marked distinction in how
        each  system prefers to define the institution—audience relationship. In other words,
        although all broadcasting institutions must by definition imagine the audience as object to
        be conquered, the meaning, intent or import of the conquest is not construed in the same
        way in the two systems.
           The pragmatic philosophy behind the commercial system is the easiest one to unravel,
        because its axioms are simple and straightforward. Commercial television can be
        characterized at several levels, but in its barest form it is based  upon  the  intertwined
        double  principle  of the making of programmes for profit and the use of television
        channels for advertising. Thus, the driving force of the system is ultimately a  purely
        economic matter: it is principally connected with the capitalist concern of making money.
        As Jay Blumler (1986:1) has observed, ‘individual broadcasters  [in  American
        commercial television] may be moved by aspirations of communication excellence, “love
        of television”, social purpose or sheer creative autonomy. But in the end, all such aims
        must be subordinated to the overriding profit-maximising goal.’
           In principle, the workings of  the  system are relatively simple. Programmes are
        transmitted by commercial television networks and stations in order  to  carry
        commercials, which are usually inserted between programmes or sections  of
        programmes. The advertisers whose products are offered for sale in the commercials pay
        large sums of money to the broadcasters in exchange for the air time they acquire to
        disseminate the messages. The system operates according to the laws of the capitalist
        market economy, so that advertising time in the most popular programmes is generally
        the most expensive. Thus, in the autumn of 1985, a thirty-second time spot in NBC’s The
        Cosby Show, then the programme on American prime time television that was measured
        as drawing the largest audience, cost $270,000 (ibid.: 5).
           It is for this precise economic reason that audience  maximization  has  become  so
        paramount a principle in commercial television, and concordantly, why the production of
        ratings through audience measurement has become an  absolutely  crucial  subsidiary
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38