Page 126 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 126

5. ORGANIZATIONAL-LEVEL DISCRIMINATION
                                                 95
 greater specialization of labor, a proliferation of titles, narrow spans of con­
 trol, and lengthy chains of command. In addition to facilitating segregation,
 these characteristics decrease discretion by making it more likely that be­
 haviors are closely monitored (Kelley, 1993). Deviations from the norms
 of the dominant coalition may be less acceptable and nonmajority group
 members' diverse approaches to work tasks may be less likely to be en­
 couraged (Oerton, 1994). The existence of a formal diversity or EEO officer
 also has implications for discrimination. The diversity officer has an im­
 portant role in reengineering HR systems to avoid discriminating against
 those who do not "fit" (Arvey et al., 1996). When the diversity/EEO officer
 is highly paid relative to other administrators, the officer is seen as power­
 ful within the organization and employees perceive that the organization
 is committed to eliminating discrimination (Morrison & Von Glinow, 1990;
 Perry et al., 1994).
 Informal Structure The patterns of interpersonal relationships in organi­
 zations also play an important role in organizational discrimination. Racial
 minorities often lack access to informal social networks in organizations
 because participation in informal groups is influenced by sociocultural
 similarity or "homophily" (Ibarra, 1993). Similarly, women tend to belong
 to gender-segregated networks within organizations (Brass, 1985). The re­
 sult of segregated networks is that women and racial minorities tend to
 be less central to the networks of the dominant coalition and hence re­
 ceive fewer favorable organizational outcomes such as access to informa­
 tion about jobs, organizational status, and mobility (Ragins & Sundstrom,
 1989; Seidel, Polzer, & Stewart, 2000). Moreover, because of the fact that
 most high-ranking positions in organizations are still held by White males,
 women and racial minorities are at a disadvantage when it comes to find­
 ing a mentor who can offer instrumental or career-related support and
 access (Burke, McKeen, & McKenna, 1993; Tsui & O'Reilly, 1989; Whitely,
 Dougherty, & Dreher, 1991). When women and racial minorities do find
 mentors, the mentor relationships tend to provide a narrower range of ben­
 efits and are more difficult to manage successfully (Kram, 1985; Thomas,
 1993).

 Organizational Culture

 Traditional approaches to eliminating discrimination have typically
 focused on recruiting and hiring increased numbers of nontraditional
 employees (Gottfredson, 1992; Jackson, 1992), but have stopped short of
 emphasizing the elimination of more subtle forms of discrimination in
 organizations, such as in an organization's basic assumptions and values,
 or culture (Carnevale & Stone, 1995; Triandis, Kurowski, & Gelfand, 1994).
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131