Page 235 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 235

SHORE AND GOLDBERG
 204
 other societal changes that make the study of aging at work particularly im­
 portant. Organizations have been laying off employees in record numbers
 for the last 15 years (Cascio, 2002), challenging assumptions of job security
 for loyalty and hard work (Rousseau, 1995). Such changes may be partic­
 ularly likely to adversely affect middle-aged and older workers who may
 have significant financial responsibilities, yet many more problems than
 younger workers getting re-employed (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002).
 Additionally, with decreasing management layers in organizations, fewer
 promotional opportunities are available for employees. Such restructur­
 ing may exacerbate career progression problems faced by older workers,
 particularly during this period of rapid technological changes when older
 workers are assumed to be less trainable (Maurer, 2001), and evidence of
 age norms that suggest older workers will be judged less favorably when
 compared with their younger counterparts (Lawrence, 1987, 1988). Fur­
 thermore, a recent survey of 340 executives showed that 61 % believe that
 age discrimination is a greater problem today than it was just one year ago,
 and 35% reported encountering age discrimination in their most recent job
 search (ExecuNet, 2002).
 In this chapter, we first discuss alternative causes of age discrimination,
 including stereotyping, relational demography, career timetables, and pro­
 totype matching. Second, we present a model of age discrimination. Third,
 we present summaries of the research on the effects of age discrimination
 on organizational entry, experiences in organizations, and organizational
 exit. Finally, we suggest an agenda for future research.


   VIEWS OF AGE DISCRIMINATION

 Stereotyping

 In the early 1950s, Kirchner and his colleagues found that hourly employees
 had more positive attitudes toward older workers than did their supervi­
 sors (Kirchner & Dunnette, 1954; Kirchner, Lindbom, & Paterson, 1952).
 These results were duplicated by Bird and Fisher 30 years later (1986), sug­
 gesting the continued importance of exploring reasons for differential atti­
 tudes toward older workers. One potential explanation is that of negative
 stereotypes of older workers. Stereotypes of older people include views
 that they are less productive, less flexible, less creative, less ambitious,
 harder to train (Kulik, Perry, & Bourhis, 2000; Ringenbach & Jacobs, 1994;
 Sonnenfeld, 1978), and less economically beneficial (Finkelstein & Burke,
 1998). Craft, Doctors, Shkop, and Benecki (1979) found that older job candi­
 dates were more likely than young candidates to be viewed as opinionated,
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240