Page 295 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 295

STONE-ROMERO
 262
             PERSONALITY
 In view of this chapter's focus on the stigmatizing consequences of per­
 sonality, this section considers two major issues. First, a working definition
 of personality is presented. Second, a popular typology of personality is
 described.
 The Personality Construct
 Personality is often viewed from two perspectives: (a) the person's social
 reputation in terms of the way that he or she is viewed by others with respect
 to such traits as dominance, agreeableness, extroversion, and risk-taking
 propensity, and (b) the person's inner nature in terms of "the structures,
 dynamics, processes, and propensities inside a person that explain why he
 or she behaves in a characteristic way" (Hogan, 1991, p. 875). In accordance
 with the social reputation perspective, many theorists and researchers ar­
 gue that traits are central to the structure of personality and its measure­
 ment (e.g., Wiggins & Pincus, 1992). Thus, this chapter focuses largely on
 the trait perspective.

 Major Dimensions of Personality

 In recent years, the approach to conceptualizing and measuring personality
 traits that has attracted the most attention among industrial and organi­
 zational psychologists is the Big Five model (Digman, 1990). It posits the
 existence of five major dimensions of personality: (a) neuroticism or emo­
 tional stability, (b) extraversion or surgency, (c) intelectance or openness
 to experience, (d) agreeableness or likability, and (e) conscientiousness or
 conformity. Of these factors, the construct that is of greatest interest here
 is neuroticism or emotional stability, which has also been labeled neg­
 ative affectivity (Watson & Clark, 1984). One important reason for this
 focus is that being labeled as emotionally unstable or neurotic can be es­
 pecially stigmatizing and harmful to either job applicants or job incum­
 bents.



 PERSONALITY MEASUREMENT IN ORGANIZATIONS

 In view of this chapter's focus on the stigmatizing effects of formal and
 informal assessments of personality, this section consider two issues sur­
 rounding such assessments in work organizations. First, some views on the
 use of personality measures for personnel selection purposes are presented.
   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300