Page 646 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 646

Research and Development  6 7 3

                Chapter 1) for venting in-house dust explosions at the top and boot of the elevator were
                used in combination with flame-triggeredwater mist injection along the elevator legs.
                  Going and Snoeys (2002) discussed suitablemethods for mitigating metal dust explo-
                sions based on experimental investigation. In particular,isolation,venting, and automatic
                suppression were considered.



                9.3.4
                GENERATION AND PROPERTIES OF EXPLOSIVE DUST CLOUDS
                IN INDUSTRY


                The challenge is to characterize typical dust cloud structures in terms of spatial distri-
                butions of particle size, dust concentration,turbulence, and global flow generated in typ-
                ical process units, like mills, dryers, mixers, bucket elevatorsand other conveyors,silos,
                filters, cyclones, and connecting ducts. These cloud structures define the initial cloud
                properties at the location of the primary dust explosion and may have a major impact
                on the course of development of the explosion. It is well known that the dynamic state
                of a dust cloud dramatically influences both its ignition sensitivity and its combustion
                rate.
                  Comparatively little new quantitative knowledge of practical use has been traced.
                Therefore, experimental investigation of  typical processes of  the generation of  dust
                clouds and the resulting cloud structures in various types of process equipment and
                operation modes should be encouraged. This is an area where close interaction of fun-
                damental and applied research can be highly beneficial.The work of Hauert et al. (19941,
                discussed in Section 9.2.2, constitutes an important step in this direction.
                  Jong et al. (19991, in their useful review of methods for determining powder “flow-
                ability,” mentioned two methods for determining the dispersibility, or “dustability,” of
                powders that are of interest in the present context (see also Chapter 3 and Section 7.4.2
                in Chapter 7). Dahmann and Mocklinghoff (2000), in the context of industrial hygiene,
                also described a method for testing the “dustability” of industrial powders.



                9.3.5
                PREVENT1NG 1GNITION SOURCES


                9.3.5.1
                Introductory  Remarks

                Reference is made to the first column of Table 1.9 in Chapter 1.A considerable amount
                of fundamentalknowledge is available, as discussed in Section 9.2 with reference to the
                second column of Table 9.1. Generally any “ignition”process comprises a range of very
                complex subprocesses. Simple parameters, such as a minimum ignition energy or tem-
                perature, are not true constants for a given dust but vary significantly with the geome-
                try and other properties of the ignition source as well as with the state of the dust cloud.
                  Maurer and Glor (1996) discussed the extent to which the minimum ignition energy
                of a dust, determined in a standard test, can be used as a basic criterion for selecting an
   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651