Page 33 - Dynamic Vision for Perception and Control of Motion
P. 33

1.5  What Type of Vision System Is Most Adequate?      17


            one might say); if it can be invoked in corresponding situations in the future, it will
            help to better control one’s behavior in similar cases (see Chapter 3).

                                  Past           Short -  term
                                            memory      expec-  Future
                                                        tations
                              history

                    Details of internal               S e n s i n g  Sparse
                                                         Point
                      representations         State     ‘here      long–term
                                             history of   and      expecta-
                                              objects    now’       tions

                  Time                                  P r e-        Time
                                                        d i c-
                Abstracted experience
                • Model elements for inter-  control    t i-
                 pretation of sensor data               o n
                • Goal functions
                • Control mode actuation
                • Instantiation control
                Long–term memory
                                           Extended presence
            Figure 1.6. Symbolic representation of the interactions between the ‘mental-’ and the ‘real
            world’ (point ‘here and now’) in closed-loop form

              Intelligence, thus, is defined as allowing deep understanding of processes and
            the way the “own” body may take advantage of this. Since proper reactions depend
            on the situation encountered, recognizing situations early and correctly and know-
            ing what to do in these cases (decision-making) is at the core of intelligence. In the
            sense of steady learning, all resulting actions are monitored and exploited to im-
            prove the internal representations for better use in the future. Figure 1.6 shows a
            symbolic representation of the overall interaction between the (individual) “mental
            world” as data manipulation activity in a prediction-error feedback loop. It spans
            part of the time axis (horizontal line) and the “real world” represented by the spa-
            tial point “here” (where the sensors are). The spatial point “here”, with its local en-
            vironment, and the temporal point “now”, where the interaction of the subject with
            the real world takes place, is the only 4-D point  for the autonomous system to
            make real-world experience. All interactions with the world take place “here and
            now” (see central box). The rest of the world, its extensions in space and time, are
            individual constructs in the  “mental world” to “make sense” of the sensor data
            stream and its invariance properties observed individually, and as a social endeavor
            between agents capable of proper information exchange.
              The widely varying interpretations of similar events in different human cultures
            are an indication of the wide variety of relatively stable interpretation systems pos-
            sible. Biological systems had to start from scratch; social groups were content with
            interpretations, which allowed them to adjust their lives correspondingly. Inconsis-
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38