Page 153 - Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
P. 153

Educating the Engineer of 2020:  Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
  http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11338.html


                136                            EDUCATING THE ENGINEER OF 2020


                   As Jack Levy (EUR ING Professor at the City University in the
               United Kingdom) has said (2002), “While these components of com-
               petence of professionalism are needed, the way they are acquired varies,
               as does the point at which the national professional title is awarded . . .
               [and] the length of the academic course may vary widely, from three
               years to five or more years.”
                   In the following sections, current activities dealing with mutual rec-
               ognition of accreditation of engineering degree programs, engineering
               technologist degree programs, and the professional level for registered
               engineering practitioners are summarized.


                           ENGINEERING DEGREE PROGRAMS

                                     Washington Accord

                   The Washington Accord was signed in 1989 by the groups in Aus-
               tralia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the
               United States responsible for accrediting professional engineering de-
               gree programs in their countries. The accord recognizes “substantial
               equivalency” of the programs accredited by the signatories and satisfac-
               tion of the “academic requirements for the practice of engineering at the
               professional level.” The accord states that the “processes, policies and
               procedures” used in the accreditation of academic programs are compa-
               rable and “recommends that graduates of accredited programs in any of
               the signatory countries be recognized by the other countries as having
               met the academic requirements for entry to the practice of engineering”
               (Washington Accord, 2004).
                   The Washington Accord has several limitations. First, it covers pro-
               fessional engineering undergraduate programs but not engineering tech-
               nology or postgraduate programs. Second, it does not apply to degree
               programs accredited before signing by the accrediting body. Third, it
               does not apply to degree programs declared or recognized as “substan-
               tially equivalent” by the signatories. Finally, it covers only the academic
               requirements of licensing, but not the actual licensing, which still varies
               from country to country.
                   Interest in the Washington Accord has increased significantly since
               it was signed in 1989. Two more countries have signed on since then
               and are now full signatories: Hong Kong in 1995 and South Africa in








                      Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158