Page 76 - Electric Drives and Electromechanical Systems
P. 76

Chapter 2   Analysing a drive system  69


                 nnn
                   Example 2.5
                   Consider the risks associated with an individual component within a motor drive system, in
                   this case a motor’s tachogenerator.
                     An illustration of the FEMA process, which takes a bottom up approach is shown in
                   Table 2.5.
                     The rating is a subjective measure of the consequence of an undesirable event upon the
                   operators, company and the system itself. In practice the scale used will be company specific.
                   In this example the scale runs from 1 to 5, with 5 being, the highest probability, the most
                   serious consequence or the probability of not being identified.
                                                                                         nnn

                   Risk assessment is the second stage of the risk management methodology. All
                 undesired events can be grouped into one of two categories, termed here as physical
                 undesired events and operational undesired events. A physical undesired event typically
                 involves some possibility of physical failure, for example, as a result of wear or corrosion
                 of part of a subsystem during use. The latter may, or may not, lead on to an operational
                 undesired event. An operational undesired event is defined as an event leading to death
                 or injury, or a near miss, in which there is no physical failure of any part of the equip-
                 ment being assessed. The next step requires a determination of the likelihood of each
                 significant undesired event and the severity of its consequences. Success is dependent
                 upon the comprehensive identification of possible undesired events and knowing how
                 these can be related back to the initiating events, which caused them. The process in-
                 volves determining the likelihood that the initiating event will be detected, before serious
                 damage can occur; determining the corresponding likelihood of recovery from, or
                 correction of, the initiating event; assessing the likelihood that the initiating event will
                 escalate to give rise to an undesired event; and finally, determining the consequences




                 Table 2.5  FMEA risk assessment for a tachogenerator as fitted to a motor drive
                 system. P is the probability, S the seriousness of the fault, D the likelihood that the
                 fault will reach the customer and R ¼ P   S  D is the priority measure. P, S and D are
                 measured on a scale of 1e5.
                 Failure
                 mode      Cause                         Hazard   PS D R Corrective action
                 Plug failure  Used as a step            Overspeed 3 4 1 12 Safety cover and warning label
                 Incorrect  Assembly fault               Overspeed 2 4 1 8 Revise documentation and
                 wiring                                                  inspection
                 Broken    Metal fatigue due to misalignment  Overspeed 1 4 1 4 Revise documentation and
                 coupling  on assemble                                   inspection
                 Wiring failure Fatigue caused by vibration  Overspeed 1 4 2 8 Design and use of cable restraints
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81