Page 40 - Electromagnetics
P. 40

Subtracting again, we have

                                                                       ∂B 0      ∂D 0
                                       E 0 · (∇× H 0 ) − H 0 · (∇× E 0 ) = H 0 ·  + E 0 ·  ,
                                                                        ∂t        ∂t
                        hence

                                                                 ∂D 0      ∂B 0
                                              −∇ · (E 0 × H 0 ) = E 0 ·  + H 0 ·
                                                                  ∂t        ∂t
                        by (B.44). Integrating both sides throughout V and using the divergence theorem on the
                        left-hand side, we get



                                                                  ∂D 0      ∂B 0
                                        −  (E 0 × H 0 ) · dS =  E 0 ·  + H 0 ·   dV.
                                           S               V       ∂t        ∂t
                        Breaking S into two arbitrary portions and using (B.6), we obtain


                                                                            ∂D 0      ∂B 0
                                 E 0 · (ˆ n × H 0 ) dS −  H 0 · (ˆ n × E 0 ) dS =  E 0 ·  + H 0 ·  dV.
                                                                            ∂t        ∂t
                               S 1                S 2                V
                        Now if ˆ n × E 0 = 0 or ˆ n × H 0 = 0 over all of S, or some combination of these conditions
                        holds over all of S, then

                                                       ∂D 0      ∂B 0
                                                   E 0 ·   + H 0 ·    dV = 0.                  (2.13)
                                                V       ∂t        ∂t
                        This expression implies a relationship between E 0 , D 0 , B 0 , and H 0 . Since V is arbitrary,
                        we see that one possibility is simply to have D 0 and B 0 constant with time. However,
                        since the fields are identically zero for t < 0, if they are constant for all time then those
                        constant values must be zero. Another possibility is to have one of each pair (E 0 , D 0 )
                        and (H 0 , B 0 ) equal to zero. Then, by (2.9) and (2.10), E 0 = 0 implies B 0 = 0, and
                        D 0 = 0 implies H 0 = 0.Thus E 1 = E 2 , B 1 = B 2 , and so on, and the solution is unique
                        throughout V . However, we cannot in general rule out more complicated relationships.
                        The number of possibilities depends on the additional constraints on the relationship
                        between E 0 , D 0 , B 0 , and H 0 that we must supply to describe the material supporting
                        the field — i.e., the constitutive relationships. For a simple medium described by the
                        time-constant permittivity 
 and permeability µ, (13) becomes

                                                      ∂E 0        ∂H 0
                                                  E 0 · 
  + H 0 · µ   dV = 0,
                                               V       ∂t          ∂t
                        or
                                              1 ∂
                                                     (
E 0 · E 0 + µH 0 · H 0 ) dV = 0.
                                              2 ∂t  V
                        Since the integrand is always positive or zero (and not constant with time, as mentioned
                        above), the only possible conclusion is that E 0 and H 0 must both be zero, and thus the
                        fields are unique.
                          When establishing more complicated constitutive relations, we must be careful to en-
                        sure that they lead to a unique solution, and that the condition for uniqueness is un-

                                                                         = 0 implies that the tangential
                        derstood. In the case above, the assumption ˆ n × E 0
                                                                       S
                        components of E 1 and E 2 are identical over S — that is, we must give specific values of
                        these quantities on S to ensure uniqueness. A similar statement holds for the condition

                        ˆ n × H 0    = 0. Requiring that constitutive relations lead to a unique solution is known
                               S
                        © 2001 by CRC Press LLC
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45