Page 62 - Elements of Distribution Theory
P. 62

P1: JZP
            052184472Xc02  CUNY148/Severini  May 24, 2005  2:29





                            48                  Conditional Distributions and Expectation


                              The conclusion of this lemma can be stated as follows: for any A ⊂ X, q 1 (A, y) =
                            q 2 (A, y) for almost all y (F Y ). As in the statement of the lemma, this means that the set
                            of y for which q 1 (A, y) = q 2 (A, y) does not hold has probability 0 under the distribution
                            given by F Y . Alternatively, we may write that q 1 (A, ·) = q 2 (A, ·) almost everywhere (F Y ),
                            or, more simply, q 1 (A, ·) = q 2 (A, ·) a.e. (F Y ).


                            Proof of Lemma 2.2. Fix a set A ⊂ X.For n = 1, 2,..., define
                                              Y n ={y ∈ Y: |q 1 (A, y) − q 2 (A, y)|≥ 1/n}.

                            Note that Y 1 ⊂ Y 2 ··· and
                                                           ∞

                                                             Y n = Y 0 .
                                                          n=1
                            For each n = 1, 2,..., let

                                               B n ={y ∈ Y: q 1 (A, y) − q 2 (A, y) ≥ 1/n}
                            and

                                               C n ={y ∈ Y: q 2 (A, y) − q 1 (A, y) ≥ 1/n}
                            so that Y n = B n ∪ C n , n = 1, 2,....
                              Fix n. Since both q 1 and q 2 satisfy (2.3),
                                                                        1             1

                               0 =    q 1 (A, y) dF Y (y) −  q 2 (A, y) dF Y (y) ≥  dF Y (y) =  Pr(Y ∈ B n )
                                                                        n             n
                                    B n               B n                  B n
                            so that Pr(Y ∈ B n ) = 0. Similarly, Pr(Y ∈ C n ) = 0. Hence, for each n = 1, 2,...,
                            Pr(Y ∈ Y n ) = 0.
                              By condition (P4) on probability distributions, given in Chapter 1, together with the fact
                            that Y 0 = Y 1 ∪ Y 2 ∪· · · ,
                                                 Pr(Y ∈ Y 0 ) = lim Pr(Y ∈ Y n ) = 0,
                                                             n→∞
                            proving the result.

                              Here we will refer to the conditional probability, with the understanding that there may
                            be another version of the conditional probability that is equal to the first for y in a set of
                            probability 1.
                              It is important to note that, when Y has an absolutely continuous distribution, conditional
                            probabilities of the form Pr(X ∈ A|Y = y 0 ) for a specific value y 0 ∈ Y are not well defined,
                            except as a function q(A, y) satisfying (2.3) evaluated at y = y 0 , and this fact can sometimes
                            cause difficulties.
                              For instance, suppose we wish to determine Pr(X ∈ A|(X, Y) ∈ B), for some sets A
                            and B, A ⊂ X and B ⊂ X × Y, where Pr((X, Y) ∈ B) = 0. Suppose further that the event
                            (X, Y) ∈ B can be described in terms of two different random variables W and Z, each of
                            which is a function of (X, Y); that is, suppose there exist functions W and Z and values w 0
                            and z 0 in the ranges of W and Z, respectively, such that

                                  {(x, y) ∈ X × Y: W(x, y) = w 0 }={(x, y) ∈ X × Y: Z(x, y) = z 0 }= B.
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67