Page 149 -
P. 149

126    6. Proof of Mordell’s Finite Generation Theorem

         (1) |P|≥ 0 for all P ∈ A, and for each real number r the set of P ∈ A with
            |P|≤ r is finite.
         (2) |mP|=|m||P| for all P ∈ A and integers m.
         (3) |P + Q|≤|P|+|Q| for all P, Q ∈ A.
           Observethatfromthese axioms P is a torsion point if and only if |P|= 0. By
        the first axiom the torsion subgroup Tors(A) of A is therefore finite.
                                                        n
                                                                          n
                                                             n
        (1.2) Examples. The restriction of the Euclidean norm on R to Z is a norm on Z .
        The zero norm is a norm on any finite abelian group, and, in fact, it is the only norm.
        If A i is an abelian group with norm || i for i = 1,..., n, then A 1 ⊕· · · ⊕ A n = A
        has a norm given by |(P 1 ,..., P n )|=|P 1 | 1 +· · · +|P n | n . In particular, any finitely
                                                             n
        generated abelian group A has a norm since A is isomorphic to Z × Tors(A).The
        converse is the next proposition.
        (1.3) Proposition. An abelian groupA is finitely generated if and only if the index
        (A : mA) is finite for some m > 1 and the groupA has a norm function.
        Proof. The direct implication is contained in the above discussion. Conversely,
        let R 1 ,..., R n be representatives in A for the cosets modulo mA, and let c =
        max i |R i |+ 1. Let X denote the finite set of all P ∈ A with |P|≤ c, and let G
        be the subgroup of A generated by X. In particular, each R i ∈ X ⊂ G.
           If there exists P ∈ A − G, then there exists such a P with minimal norm by the
        first axiom. Since P ≡ R i (mod mA) for some coset representative of A/mA,we
        have P = R i + mQ or mQ = P + (−R i ),and
                      m|Q|=|mQ|≤|P|+|R i | < |P|+ c ≤ m|P|.
        From the minimal character of P ∈ A − G, we see that Q ∈ G, and hence the
        sum P = R i + mQ is also in G. This contradicts the assumption that A − G is
        nonempty and, therefore, A = G, because G is finitely generated by X. This proves
        the proposition.
        (1.4) Remark. The above argument has a constructive character and is frequently
        referred to as a descent procedure. For a given P ∈ A we can choose a sequence

            P = R i(0) + mP 1 ,  P 1 = R i(1) + mP 2 ,...,  P j = R i( j) + mP j+1 ,...
        with
                      |P| > |P 1 | > |P 2 | > ··· > |P j | > |P j+1 | > ···
        and the descent stops when some |P j |≤ c. Thus P is a sum of chosen coset repre-
        sentatives.
           In the next section we show how descent was first used by Fermat to show the
                                4
                                     4
        nonexistence of solutions to x + y = 1, where x and y are rational numbers both
        nonzero. The program for the remainder of this chapter is to check the two conditions
        of (1.3) for A = E(k) the rational points on an elliptic curve over a number field.
                                          r
        (1.5) Remark. If the index (A : pA) = p for a prime number p, then r is an upper
        bound for the rank of A. This principle is used frequently in obtaining information
        on the rank of the group of rational points on an elliptic curve especially for p = 2.
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154