Page 321 -
P. 321

296    15. Elliptic Curves over Global Fields and  -Adic Representations

        The hypothesis Tr M (a) = Tr N (a) for a( j) becomes simply the relation

                             m(i)Tr E( j) (a) = n(i)Tr E( j) (a).
        Specialize to a = 1, and we obtain the relation m(i) = n(i) since Tr E( j) (a) =
        dimE( j)  = 0inthe field F ⊂ A. This shows that M and N are isomorphic and
        proves the proposition.

        (2.7) Corollary. Let G be a group, and let ρ and ρ be two semisimple finite dimen-
        sional representations defined over a field F of characteristic zero. Then ρ and ρ
        are isomorphic if and only if Tr(ρ(s)) = Tr(ρ (s)) for all s ∈ G.

           The proof of the corollary of (2.6) follows from the discussion at the end of (2.5).
           Later, we will also consider characteristic polynomials of ρ(s) in GL(V ) for
        a representation ρ : G → GL(V ), where V is finite dimensional over F.These
        polynomials are defined by

                           P ρ (s)(T ) = det(1 − ρ(s)T ) ∈ F[T ].

        Then P ρ (s)(0) = 1 and the derivative at T = 0is P ρ (s) (0) =−Tr(ρ(s)) since
        P ρ (s)(T ) = 1 − Tr(ρ(s))T + ... . In fact, from the traces of elements, one can
        recover the characteristic polynomial.
           The following formula comes up frequently in the context of  -representations.
        (2.8) Proposition. Let u : V → V be a linear transformation of a finite dimensional
        vector space V over a field of characteristic zero. Then the characteristic polynomial
        satisfies

                                             ∞      n  n
                                   −1           Tr(u )T
                         det(1 − uT )  = exp              .
                                                   n
                                             n=1
        Proof. We can choose a basis of V so that u is upper triangular. Then det(1−uT ) =
        (1−c 1 T )...(1−c m T ) where the c 1 ,..., c m , are the eigenvalues with multiplicities
        of u and m = dim F V . Now use the classical expansion
                                            ∞
                                     1        n   n
                                               c T
                                log      =
                                   1 − cT       n
                                            n=1
        to prove the proposition.
                                                          ˇ
        §3. Galois Representations and the N´ eron–Ogg–Safareviˇ c
            Criterion in the Global Case

        We keep the notations introduced in (1.4) for an algebraic number field K, in partic-
        ular, for each place v of K, the valuation ring R (v) in K, the local field K v with its
        valuation ring R v , the residue class field k(v) of either R (v) or R v ,and Nv equal to
        the cardinality of k(v). We consider algebraic extensions L of K in a fixed algebraic
        closure K = Q and extensions w to L of places v of K. The fact that w extends v is
                   ¯
               ¯
        denoted w|v.
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326