Page 241 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Polymer
P. 241

P1: GQT Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN012F-600  July 26, 2001  11:16






               750                                                                                  Polymers, Recycling


                 One approach that can be economical is through use of  duced by these means are free of concerns about bacterial
               devices that depend upon the density differences of com-  contamination.
               ponents. Sometimes components of a pulverized polymer
               may be separated in air streams, while in other cases, the
               use of liquid baths might be employed. In the latter case,  IV. OVERVIEW
               separation may sometimes be aided through use of deter-
               gents or surface-active agents that selectively interact with  It is evident that there is no single solution for polymer
               one of the components and aid its floating or sinking.  recycling. The choice of an approach is often governed
                 The effectiveness of any sorting procedure is depen-  by economics, and at present it is unlikely that the ma-
               dent upon its accuracy. The properties of a separated poly-  jority of plastic waste can be economically recycled. This
               mer can be appreciably affected by the presence of small  fraction will increase with employment of more “design
               amounts of a different one. The cost of the sorting pro-  for recycling,” improvement of means for sorting, and de-
               cess increases, as does the need for its accuracy, so it is  velopment of infrastructure. Societal and legislative con-
               necessary to seek a compromise between purity and cost.  siderations can be as important as technical aspects in
                 Separation of polymers prior to processing is usually  affecting such changes. However, there will always be a
               essential since polymer melts are usually very viscous  portion of the waste stream for which recycling is not the
               and separation procedures for the melt are virtually im-  best choice, so alternatives such as generation of energy
               possible. This suggests the need for procedures involving  are viable considerations.
               depolymerization to reduce molecular weight and render
               the mixture more susceptible to conventional procedures.
                                                                 SEE ALSO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES

               B. Secondary and Tertiary Recycling
                                                                 BIOPOLYMERS • ENERGY FLOWS IN ECOLOGY AND IN THE
               These approaches involve chemical modification so as to  ECONOMY • HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATION • RE-
               reduce the molecular weight of the polymeric species,  NEWABLE ENERGY FROM BIOMASS • WASTE-TO-ENERGY
               often reducing them back to monomers. Such low-   SYSTEMS
               molecular-weight materials may then be separated by con-
               ventional means such as distillation, after which they may
               serve as the feed stock for repolymerization or other chem-  BIBLIOGRAPHY
               ical operations. The means for molecular weight reduc-
               tion may involve pyrolysis, hydrolysis, or alcoholysis, the  Andrews, G. D., and Subramanian, P. M. (eds.). (1992). “Emerging Tech-
               choice being dependent upon the kind of bonding occur-  nologies in Plastic Recycling,” American Chemical Society, Washing-
               ring in the polymers involved.                      ton, DC.
                                                                  ARC. (1999). “ARC’99. 6th Annual Recycling Conference Proceed-
                 A disadvantage of these procedures is that they are
                                                                   ings,” SPE Recycling Division.
               usually demanding of energy necessary for breaking the  Brandrup, J., Bittner, M., Michaeli, W, and Menges, G. (eds.). (1996).
               chemical bonds holding the monomer units together in the  “Recycling and Recovery of Plastics,” Hanser, Munich.
               polymer. They are in opposition to the desire for prevent-  Ehrig, R. J. (ed.). (1992). “Plastics Recycling, Products and Processes,”
               ingentropyincreaseinthatoneisconvertingalow-entropy  Hanser, Munich.
                                                                  Le Mantia, F. P. (ed.). (1993). “Recycling of Plastic Materials,” Chem
               polymer species into higher entropy monomers.
                                                                   Tec Toronto.
                 An advantage is that cleaner separations are possible,  Mishra, M. K. (ed.). (1999). “Special issue on polymer and fiber recy-
               and the reduced molecular weight material may be sepa-  cling,” Polymer Plastics Technol. Eng. 38.
               ratedfromothercomponentssuchasfillersandreinforcing  Rader, C. P., Baldwin, S. D., Cornell, D. D., Sadler, G. D., and
               fiber by processes such as filtration. Application is pos-  Stockel, R. F. (eds.). (1995). “Plastics, Rubber, and Paper Recycling,
                                                                   A Pragmatic Approach,” American Chemical Society, Washington,
               sible to materials like carpets, disposable cameras, and
                                                                   DC.
               laminated bottles, where separation by primary recycling  Stein, R. S. (1992). “Polymer recycling: Opportunities and limitations,”
               means is difficult or impossible. Also, the materials pro-  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 635–838.
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246