Page 161 - Environmental Control in Petroleum Engineering
P. 161

148    Environmental Control in Petroleum Engineering


 needed, and make recommendations for corrective action to address
 problems. In preparing the written report, any problems can usually
 be grouped into one of the following three categories:
   1. Activities that are in violation of permits or regulations, activities
      that are in violation of company policies, or policies that encour-
      age activities to be in violation. These activities require the
      attention of senior management and need immediate correction.
   2. Conditions that could result in a violation or in a situation that
      could harm the environment. Corrective actions are needed, but
      immediate action is not necessarily required. Corrective actions
      could be scheduled around site operations.
   3. Local issues concerning housekeeping, storage, purchasing, or
      similar items. Corrective actions are recommended, but not
      necessarily required.
 Depending on the magnitude of the problems identified and the
 corrective actions recommended, a follow-up visit should be conducted
 within 3 to 12 months after the audit.
   Typical operational problems that are identified in environmental
 audits are compressors and engines that are installed without state
 permits or inventorying; gas plants and sweetening plants that are
 installed or modified without considering new source performance
 standards [NSPS] or prevention of significant deterioration [PSD]
 monitoring, analysis, or control technology; unapproved analytical
 methods that are used for determining compliance; and underground
 injection wells that have not received the proper permits. Typical
 problems with personnel training are field foremen who do not know
 if hazardous substances are located at their site or how to report a
 release to regulatory agencies if a release occurs, and engineering staff
 who are not well informed of environmental design requirements.
   One difficulty with performing an internal environmental audit is
 that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can request a copy of
 the audit under certain circumstances. Unless there is a commitment
 by top management to correct any and all deficiencies found, the
 existence of the audit could leave the company and its employees open
 to regulatory action, including criminal penalties for willful violation
 of the law for not implementing corrective measures.
   A number of case histories on developing environmental audits for
 oil and gas production facilities have been published (Guckian et al.,
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166